![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message m... So what does it mean to an itinerant pilot? It means the pilot ought to ask what it means. It means nothing. You're mistaken. No, I'm not. Of course you are, your position is absurd. And your evidence, should I call it that, does not address the issue of whether, to be specified, it must be specified in writing, which is the issue in question. How can it be otherwise? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How can it be otherwise?
Things were specified before the dawn of writing. When my wife asks me to go to the store and pick up yogurt, but only the "plain", not the vanilla, she doesn't write it down. Nonetheless, the kind of yougurt she wants is specified. Likewise, when she asks me to pick up chips, I know from experience that she means a specific kind of chips. (and no, I'm not talking about Intel or Motorola either). Three hundred years ago, there =were= no dictionaries, but the meanings of words were still specified through usage. That's how it can be otherwise. "Modified straight in" is specified in this same manner, although it ends up specified only to the locals. Itinerants are left with a question, which should be asked. While this may seem wickedly dangerous, the tradeoff is that less air time on a busy channel is used up saying "modified straight in" (which most pilots there understand) than saying "start at the intersection of I210 and I14 and follow the channel southbound towards the runway". I am presuming that the actual flight path has a good reason, and simply not using that flight path is not an option. So what does it mean to an itinerant pilot? It means the pilot ought to ask what it means. It means nothing. That =you= don't know something does not drain its meaning. You're mistaken. No, I'm not. Of course you are, your position is absurd. I'm not allowed to argue unless you've paid. Jose -- Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:49:20 GMT, Jose
wrote: That's how it can be otherwise. "Modified straight in" is specified in this same manner, although it ends up specified only to the locals. Itinerants are left with a question, which should be asked. While this may seem wickedly dangerous, the tradeoff is that less air time on a busy channel is used up saying "modified straight in" (which most pilots there understand) than saying "start at the intersection of I210 and I14 and follow the channel southbound towards the runway". I am presuming that the actual flight path has a good reason, and simply not using that flight path is not an option. I didn't mean to create a scrap here. FYI, I'm not itinerant at KHWD, it's my home airport. What I meant was, I was not given specific instructions, as is often the case at Hayward. You are normall told to fly to a specific point, don't break certain altitudes, etc. When the controller said "modified straight in", and no other instructions, I assumed that to mean that I could fly at pilot's discretion. For those of you with more hours than I (300), please correct me if I'm wrong. John Szpara Affordable Satellite Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john szpara" wrote in message news:1103668495.fa76b9a7292886cc9ad13045780a10bb@t eranews... I didn't mean to create a scrap here. FYI, I'm not itinerant at KHWD, it's my home airport. What I meant was, I was not given specific instructions, as is often the case at Hayward. You are normall told to fly to a specific point, don't break certain altitudes, etc. When the controller said "modified straight in", and no other instructions, I assumed that to mean that I could fly at pilot's discretion. For those of you with more hours than I (300), please correct me if I'm wrong. Your interpretation is as correct as any other. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Your interpretation is as correct as any other."
A bit of tongue-in-cheek, perhaps? What I don't understand, is why don't people just ask for a clarification when one is needed? It just doesn't seem like the airspace would be very safe if everyone ran around doing what they THOUGHT someone instructed them to do. To coin a whatever: "If you have to ask, you might look stupid, but if you don't ask, you might look dead. Take your choice". "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... "john szpara" wrote in message news:1103668495.fa76b9a7292886cc9ad13045780a10bb@t eranews... I didn't mean to create a scrap here. FYI, I'm not itinerant at KHWD, it's my home airport. What I meant was, I was not given specific instructions, as is often the case at Hayward. You are normall told to fly to a specific point, don't break certain altitudes, etc. When the controller said "modified straight in", and no other instructions, I assumed that to mean that I could fly at pilot's discretion. For those of you with more hours than I (300), please correct me if I'm wrong. Your interpretation is as correct as any other. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What I don't understand, is why don't people just ask for a clarification
when one is needed? It just doesn't seem like the airspace would be very safe if everyone ran around doing what they THOUGHT someone instructed them to do. Precisely. And what makes Class D so dangerous is that a) Everyone THINKS they know what they're doing, when, in fact, many are interpreting things differently b) The controller THINKS he knows where everyone is. c) The controller is often so busy that asking for clarification is extremely difficult The day I wrote about, getting a word in edgewise would have been darned-near impossible for Mary... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:Ecfyd.513$k25.152@attbi_s53... Precisely. And what makes Class D so dangerous is that b) The controller THINKS he knows where everyone is. The controller get his information from the pilots. Pilots are frequently not where they THINK they are and provide bad information to the controller. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Congestion on the approach frequency is at the heart of the problem.
Often it is impossible to ask for a clarification - and sometimes near impossible to get approach's attention at all. One time I wanted to transition a Class C, and had to listen to a long-winded conversation between the controller and a pilot. Since they wouldn't shut up long enough for me to "get a word in edgewise", I had to deliberately transmit on top of the other pilot to get the controller's attention. The best solution, if you can, is to avoid those places altogether. Most destinations have uncontrolled airports nearby, and I, for one, will always choose to use them - unless there is some pressing reason to use the towered airport. I used to be based at a Class C, but chose to move to an uncontrolled airport twice as far from where I lived - because I got sick and tired of the hassle. David Johnson |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My appologies, I didn't get the whole thred, however,
I am based at HWD, and have been there daily for almost a year and have never heard a "Modified straight in" clerance. 'Hayweird' does get some interesting traffic due to its proximity to OAK (Oakland Intl, less than 10nm and between 29 and 27L/R. This is a new one on me. Jon Wanzer CP ASEL / IA AGI IGI (CFI / CFII soon-to-be) San Jose,CA On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:35:56 -0800, john szpara wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:49:20 GMT, Jose wrote: That's how it can be otherwise. "Modified straight in" is specified in this same manner, although it ends up specified only to the locals. Itinerants are left with a question, which should be asked. While this may seem wickedly dangerous, the tradeoff is that less air time on a busy channel is used up saying "modified straight in" (which most pilots there understand) than saying "start at the intersection of I210 and I14 and follow the channel southbound towards the runway". I am presuming that the actual flight path has a good reason, and simply not using that flight path is not an option. I didn't mean to create a scrap here. FYI, I'm not itinerant at KHWD, it's my home airport. What I meant was, I was not given specific instructions, as is often the case at Hayward. You are normall told to fly to a specific point, don't break certain altitudes, etc. When the controller said "modified straight in", and no other instructions, I assumed that to mean that I could fly at pilot's discretion. For those of you with more hours than I (300), please correct me if I'm wrong. John Szpara Affordable Satellite Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:24:40 GMT, Jon Wanzer
wrote: My appologies, I didn't get the whole thred, however, I am based at HWD, and have been there daily for almost a year and have never heard a "Modified straight in" clerance. 'Hayweird' does get some interesting traffic due to its proximity to OAK (Oakland Intl, less than 10nm and between 29 and 27L/R. This is a new one on me. Hayward (weird) *is* a strange place to fly into. The ILS for 29 is 1 mile to the left, and the ILS for 27 is 2.5 miles to the right. Oakland is basically two airports. It has class C airspace, which starts barely a 1/2 mile off the end of HWD's runways. SFO's class B airspace lays above. SJC's class C starts 10 miles south. Flying anywhere in this area is like an obstacle course. As for the "modified straight in", I didn't give any thought to it at the time. I was given no other instructions, point to fly to, or traffic to follow, so I flew a route at my discretion. John Szpara Affordable Satellite Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
Negative XPDR - under the outer ring of Class C | bcjames | Piloting | 8 | August 30th 04 11:49 PM |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Overlapping class C & D | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 14 | May 6th 04 04:08 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |