![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: I don't know how it came about, or when (though I suspect it dates from early in the history of that tower). I doubt it's specified in writing anywhere, but that doesn't stop it from being, in fact, specified. Of course it does. From the OED: "specify - 1. speak or treat of a matter etc. in detail; give details or particulars." It does not have to be written down to be specified or to be specific. George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... From the OED: "specify - 1. speak or treat of a matter etc. in detail; give details or particulars." It does not have to be written down to be specified or to be specific. I suppose not. But if it isn't, the controller must explain what it means each time he uses the phrase. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It does not have to be written down to be specified or to be specific.
I suppose not. But if it isn't, the controller must explain what it means each time he uses the phrase. No, just each time he uses the phrase with a pilot that doesn't understand it. If most pilots flying there are based there, and the phrase is used often enough (and consistantly enough) and CFI/radio osmosis occurs (this is not at all farfetched), then a lot of radio time is saved, because most of the time it will not need to be explained. I do agree that this is not sufficient justification to invent phrases willy nilly. But it's really no different from "N42312 report the tanks". When the controller said "modified straight in", and no other instructions, I assumed that to mean that I could fly at pilot's discretion. For those of you with more hours than I (300), please correct me if I'm wrong. I would disagree (which is different from "you're wrong" ![]() take "modified straight in" to be a specific and common course which makes sense given the geography of the place, and if I didn't know what course that was, I'd ask. Absent altitude restrictions, I'd assume altitude is at the pilot's discretion (within the FARs). Jose -- Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
Negative XPDR - under the outer ring of Class C | bcjames | Piloting | 8 | August 30th 04 11:49 PM |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Overlapping class C & D | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 14 | May 6th 04 04:08 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |