A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Class D Sucks



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 21st 04, 04:45 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

I don't know how it came about, or when (though I suspect it dates from
early in the history of that tower). I doubt it's specified in writing
anywhere, but that doesn't stop it from being, in fact, specified.


Of course it does.


From the OED: "specify - 1. speak or treat of a matter etc. in detail; give
details or particulars."

It does not have to be written down to be specified or to be specific.

George Patterson
The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise.
  #2  
Old December 21st 04, 04:51 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...

From the OED: "specify - 1. speak or treat of a matter etc. in detail;
give
details or particulars."

It does not have to be written down to be specified or to be specific.


I suppose not. But if it isn't, the controller must explain what it means
each time he uses the phrase.


  #3  
Old December 22nd 04, 12:55 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It does not have to be written down to be specified or to be specific.

I suppose not. But if it isn't, the controller must explain what it means
each time he uses the phrase.


No, just each time he uses the phrase with a pilot that doesn't
understand it. If most pilots flying there are based there, and the
phrase is used often enough (and consistantly enough) and CFI/radio
osmosis occurs (this is not at all farfetched), then a lot of radio
time is saved, because most of the time it will not need to be explained.

I do agree that this is not sufficient justification to invent phrases
willy nilly. But it's really no different from "N42312 report the tanks".

When the controller said "modified straight in", and no other
instructions, I assumed that to mean that I could fly at pilot's
discretion. For those of you with more hours than I (300), please
correct me if I'm wrong.


I would disagree (which is different from "you're wrong" . I would
take "modified straight in" to be a specific and common course which
makes sense given the geography of the place, and if I didn't know
what course that was, I'd ask. Absent altitude restrictions, I'd
assume altitude is at the pilot's discretion (within the FARs).

Jose
--
Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carrying flight gear on the airlines Peter MacPherson Piloting 20 November 25th 04 12:29 AM
Negative XPDR - under the outer ring of Class C bcjames Piloting 8 August 30th 04 11:49 PM
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? john smith Home Built 11 August 27th 04 02:29 AM
Overlapping class C & D Andrew Sarangan Piloting 14 May 6th 04 04:08 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.