![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Comments edited into the text.....
"Rich Stowell" wrote in message om... Hi Dave, I thought the V-g diagram typically refers to a "symmetric loading," Agreed, I ought to have said "symmetrical loading" rather then "stall" - but I think this is just terminology. If the airlpane is subject to a rolling pull-out, for example, then the structural design limit is derated by 2/3. The added twisting moment present during a rolling pull-out, therefore, could lead to structural damage with as little as 4-g's in the aerobatic airplane, whereas 6-g's would be available with a straight (symmetric) pull. I wasn't aware that the 2/3 factor also applied to symmetric vs. asymmetric stalling -- can you point me toward a reference for that? I wish I could find the reference but I've had a quick look around and failed, maybe we've got an aeronautical engineer reading this who can provide a pointer...? True, some (most?) apply aileron as part of the snap roll process. However, properly done in most aerobatic airplanes, only rudder and elevator actions are necessary (ailerons neutral). I suppose that the application of aileron as part of the snap roll might then qualify as a "rolling pull" in which case, the 2/3 factor might apply. From memory, the derating to 2/3 occurs because of torsional effects AND lift asymmetry - the lift asymmetry is present without any aileron input but, as you say, many of the more experienced aero pilots use aileron to accelerate the snap (called a flick roll in the UK) once it's started. I generally teach a basic snap without aileron and then bring it in to demonstrate how it can be used to vary the rotation. Dave "Dave" wrote in message - ....snipped Don't forget that the structural g limit is for a symmetrical stall and is reduced to 2/3 for an asymmetric stall - therefore the absolute max snap roll speed at MAUW for a 6g airframe is 2xVso. Also, this speed should decrease at lighter weights by the ratio of the square roots of the weights. Vso at weight w = Vso x sqrt(w)/sqrt(MAUW), this can make a 10% difference to Vso so could easily affect the max snap speed by 10kts or more. Dave Sawdon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |
Barrel roll And g's Quest. | Robert11 | Aerobatics | 6 | July 16th 03 02:51 PM |