A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Reporters saying "TARMAC" how stupid!!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 5th 05, 07:00 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jose wrote:

Tarmac (short for tarmacadam) is actually a trade name for
the substance; it (the word)is formed from "tar" and "macadam". Macadam
(the paving substance made of crushed stone and a binder, usually tar)
is named after its inventer, John L. McAdam, a Scottish engineer.


Macadam is just the gravel, without any binder. John L. McAdam was the
first who built roads using several layers of gravel, without any
binder, each layer being pounded before the next layer was applied. This
method was new. The resulting surface was called macadam.

Tar-macadam most probably was the same thing with a binder, originally
tar, as I would assume.

Stefan
  #12  
Old January 5th 05, 07:13 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What do they use now? Sure smells like tar.

  #13  
Old January 5th 05, 07:13 PM
ShawnD2112
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Now that's funny. Those of us in both the aviation and the civil
engineering fields use the term all the time.

Try a rant about something else?

Shawn
"CASK829" wrote in message
...
Why is it that idiot reporters use the term "TARMAC"? Nobody in the
aviation
world uses that term do they? But then again reporters usually know
abolutely
nothing about aviation. What inspired this rant? The recent reporting on
the
US Airways baggage situation and the Northwest airlines flight that kept
the
passengers on the airplane for 14 hours. On another note did Northwest
lose a
lawsuit awhile back for keeping people on an airplane while they sat on
the
ground for a very long time. If I remember correctly there was talk of
false
imprisonment charges against the airline.



  #14  
Old January 5th 05, 07:18 PM
Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay Honeck wrote:

snip

English often doesn't make much sense, except in context.


Don't get me started on "pre-boarding"....

--
Frank....H
  #16  
Old January 5th 05, 07:22 PM
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Not to bust anyone's bubble but HYX is getting a new ILS and in the
process just got a new ramp - made of guess what -Tarmac... We have
already found the limitations of Tarmac and it is helicopters plus
sunshine... Helicopter skids, leetle round tubing thingies, leave
nasty dents in Tarmac in the summer...

Denny

  #17  
Old January 5th 05, 07:24 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob,

I keep thinking of the terms in aviation that have evolved. In World
War I Max Immelman performed what we would call a chandelle, creating a
maneuver that was given his name. It was a maximum performance
maneuver for the Fokker Eindecker he flew and was most definitely not a
half loop and half roll, the airplane would not do it and none of those
who observed it described it as such. Looking at books on aerobatics
in the '20s, the Immelman is a steep climbing turn. Sometime in the
'30s it became a half loop and half roll and the original Immelman turn
became the chandelle. Despite the error, we've long since accepted the
misuse of the name and probably couldn't correct it if we tried. The
only problem is that Max is credited with doing a maneuver he could not
have done, nor would he have ever done in combat because of the radical
loss of speed and risk of stalling at the top.

Warmest regards,
Rick

  #18  
Old January 5th 05, 07:25 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay,

Don't you love aviation terms.

We're going to depart from "the terminal".

Before landing we're on our "final" approach.
Really inspires confidence, eh?

Warmest regards,
Rick

  #19  
Old January 5th 05, 07:27 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay,

Actually, Fixed Base Operator is an accurate term. It was coined to
describe the operators who stopped going from place to place to teach
flying or give rides. When they decided to stay at one airport, they
established a fixed base.

Then again, a fixed base operator could have had a certain surgerical
procedure... He wasn't broken, but we got him fixed and now he
doesn't work.

Warmest regards,
Rick

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________ efamf Keith Willshaw Naval Aviation 4 November 11th 04 01:51 AM
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ John Home Built 4 November 10th 04 01:45 PM
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ihuvpe john smith Home Built 2 November 9th 04 03:50 AM
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ihuvpe john smith Instrument Flight Rules 1 November 9th 04 03:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.