![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter" wrote in message ... Peter Clark wrote Reading FAR/AIM 2004 it isn't entirely clear to me because different sections refer to day and night cross country, and I don't think the description of a day cross country applies to the night flight; the distances are 150nm and 100nm respectively. I have night flights with an instructor which exceed 100 miles in total distance, and I have a solo night flight which exceeds 100nm which was done between two airports whose direct line spacing is 119nm. I suspect that the information on the basis of which I did the last flight was bogus and I don't meet the FAA PPL requirement. Can anyone suggest the FAR/AIM 2004 sections which could clarify this? You want the FAR, 61.109(a), paragraphs 2 and 2(i) - "Except as provided in 61.110 of this part, 3 hours of night flight training in a single-engine airplane that includes (i) One cross country flight of over 100 nautical miles total distance; and (ii) 10 takeoffs and 10 landings to a full stop (with each landing involving a flight in the traffic pattern) at an airport." You meet the night cross country requirement with either flight listed above. There's no requirement for a solo night cross country of any distance in the regs. If you've done 10 night takeoffs and landings you meet the requirements for that part of the reg. The long solo cross-country (150nm) is 61.109(a)(5)(ii) - 150nm, 3 stops, one segment of which needs to be between 2 airports 50NM apart. If you happened to do this at night, great - the reg doesn't say it has to be done during the day, but the solo flight mentioned above doesn't count unless it was over 150NM (the 119NM apart meets the 50NM distance, but not the total flight distance and 3 landings). This generated quite a long thread, with a lot of people saying that "training" implies a flight with an instructor present. I wrote to the FAA with a full disclosure of my logbook entries. After a few months, they wrote back saying: Response (Joel Wilcox) - 01/04/2005 01:20 PM It appears that you meet the night experience requirements. However, you should review these times against the night experience requirements in 14 CFR 61.109(a)(2), which can be viewed he http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text....1.1.2&idno=14 Regards, JW So, either they did read my question and are saying that doing the night flights solo was OK after all, OR they haven't read my question... It doesn't matter now, but I think one should get a better response time from the FAA. Peter. You have been over the ground on this one a few times Peter on this NG and the Flyer forum. You will not get a better response from the FAA. The responses that count are from FAA Counsel (the lawyers). You can ask 5 different FSDOs the same question and get five different answers/opinions. So what's new? Ever had a straight answer from the CAA? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Piloting | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:13 PM |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Piloting | 3 | August 9th 04 08:39 PM |