![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:04:52 -0500, alexy wrote:
nobody wrote: Interesting tidbit from Bob Bliar: The A380 consumes only 3 litres of fuel per pax per 100km, equivalent to a fuel efficient diesel car. Interesting stat, but the followup discussion here points out a question on exactly what this stat is. Is it fuel burn per passenger mile at max passenger load (i.e., the 380 carries 110 times as many passengers as the 5-passenger car, but burns less than 110 times as much fuel per mile) or fuel burn per passenger mile at typical passenger loads (i.e., the 380 at a typical passenger load of, e.g., 450 carries 300 times as many passengers as the car at a typical load of 1.5 people, but burns less than 300 times as much fuel per mile. Obviously, such a statistic based on capacity is far more significant than one based on average use. 3 liters/passenger per 100KM? I suspect there are MANY 5-passenger cars that will go further than 100KM on 15 liters of fuel, but not may that will go 100KM on 4.5 liters of fuel, if 1.5 is the average load of the car. Exactly. Commercial aircraft, and especially long-haul commercial aircraft operating the sorts of routes for which the 380 is designed have far higher occupancy rates than cars, so the number of seats a car has is irrelevant. --==++AJC++==-- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "AJC" wrote in message ... On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:04:52 -0500, alexy wrote: nobody wrote: Interesting tidbit from Bob Bliar: The A380 consumes only 3 litres of fuel per pax per 100km, equivalent to a fuel efficient diesel car. Interesting stat, but the followup discussion here points out a question on exactly what this stat is. Is it fuel burn per passenger mile at max passenger load (i.e., the 380 carries 110 times as many passengers as the 5-passenger car, but burns less than 110 times as much fuel per mile) or fuel burn per passenger mile at typical passenger loads (i.e., the 380 at a typical passenger load of, e.g., 450 carries 300 times as many passengers as the car at a typical load of 1.5 people, but burns less than 300 times as much fuel per mile. Obviously, such a statistic based on capacity is far more significant than one based on average use. 3 liters/passenger per 100KM? I suspect there are MANY 5-passenger cars that will go further than 100KM on 15 liters of fuel, but not may that will go 100KM on 4.5 liters of fuel, if 1.5 is the average load of the car. Exactly. Commercial aircraft, and especially long-haul commercial aircraft operating the sorts of routes for which the 380 is designed have far higher occupancy rates than cars, so the number of seats a car has is irrelevant. --==++AJC++==-- On the Asia-Europe rutes I do not doubt that the plane will be more or less full to the brim... Nik. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force conducts live test of MOAB | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 21st 03 10:45 PM |