A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Female pilot accident rates



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old January 18th 05, 09:29 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Moore" wrote in message

"But on the average, men
have better spatial function than women.


Fortunately, they don't make fighter pilots based on averages.

-c


  #122  
Old January 18th 05, 09:30 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"NoPoliticsHere" wrote in message

This "information" you
saw two days ago supposedly citing just the opposite would immediately
come under suspicion to me, considering the politics of the last
couple of decades especially.


Then that makes your opinion subjective.

-c


  #123  
Old January 18th 05, 09:39 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"NoPoliticsHere" wrote in message

I'll admit that the only cockpit I've ever even SAT in was in a Herc
that was parked at an airshow. But as far as ever being able to fly
an F-14 in carrier operations, we'll never know. Maybe I'm a cocky
s.o.b. but I suspect I'd have had no problems, if I'd chosen that
route--always had great vision, kept very fit, good reflexes/coord., never
had an auto accident, and damn few--very few--tickets, so I'm also
disciplined to obey rules.


Well, hell, dawg. Call up the Navy and ask 'em to hand you the keys to a
Tomcat. Sheesh...decent driving record, good vision, fit, obeys rules. I'd
be surprised if they didn't commission you and let you bypass most of that
training and flight school nonsense altogether.

Truth is, I'd have been more interested in flying the bigger stuff anyway.


*chuckle* Most aviators feel the same way. Those little Tomcats are just
too small, but there's just so much competition getting into the P-3 and
KC-135 fleets. The only people who fly fighter planes off of carriers these
days are the poor sucks who washed out of cargo plane school.

-c


  #124  
Old January 18th 05, 09:45 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"hoarse with no name" wrote in message news:no2-

I say, thank God she finally died.


You know, I don't think I've ever heard a genuine aviator thank God for the
death of another.


-c



  #125  
Old January 18th 05, 09:45 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"NoPoliticsHere" wrote in message

Maybe he just meant that it was better that this woman be permanently
put out of commission (considering her record, but still being allowed
to fly), rather than crash onto the deck at some time, killing dozens
of personnel in the process. Why is that so hard for you to understand?


How much flight time have you logged, again?

-c


  #126  
Old January 18th 05, 09:47 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"NoPoliticsHere" wrote in message

A little anonymity can be a good thing Jay. Why would anyone use their

real
name in a place like this, unless they're selling something? Anonymity
is more likely to bring honesty, as far as inner opinions. Most people
who post with real names make sure they walk the line they've been told
to walk.


He must be talking about guys like Dudley. Yeesh.

-c


  #127  
Old January 18th 05, 09:49 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gig Giacona" wrote in message

And how long was it after they transitioned women to the L-1011 that the
company folded?


So if they changed the color of their stationery, or changed their
letterhead, one could draw the same ridiculous cause and effect connection.

-c


  #128  
Old January 19th 05, 02:28 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"gatt" wrote You know, I don't think I've ever
heard a

genuine aviator thank God for the
death of another.


Why in the H-E-double hockey sticks, are you bringing up such an ancient
thread?
--
Jim in NC


  #130  
Old January 19th 05, 03:04 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Philip Sondericker" wrote

Nevermind its antiquity. It was a very obvious troll.


Trolling, yes.

Na, he is a semi-regular that pops in from time to time. Might be time for
the looney bin, for him again.
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? Larry Dighera Piloting 72 April 30th 04 11:28 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.