![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike W." wrote: The moral here is, if anyone is going to be near the front of the plane, shut it down. I'll shut down if I think there's a chance they could get near the prop, even if I think they don't intend to do so. It's one thing I think I may be overly cautious about (I always shout "clear", too, even if I'm sure there's no-one around). George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... I'll shut down if I think there's a chance they could get near the prop, even if I think they don't intend to do so. It's one thing I think I may be overly cautious about (I always shout "clear", too, even if I'm sure there's no-one around). George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. It's really hard to overkill safety. After flying a while, you may think to yourself 'it's really silly to shut down the engine everytime someone gets in or out of the plane, I'm careful'. But you never know when that one little step you take will make a difference and avoid a tragedy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Canada it's illegal to leave an airplane running with
nobody at the controls, though we see cropsprayers doing it. The only exception is for handpropping, and that requires that the airplane be secured against any possible movement. Besides that, we regularly hear of folks walking into props, even with someone at the controls. A fella and his wife were taxiing out in their Cardinal when she decided she had to pee (sound familiar?) and so he returned to the ramp and kept the engine running while she got out and promptly walked thru the prop. End of wife. Is the starting procedure really THAT much hassle that we can't pull the mixture and restart a few minutes later??! Dan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My personal rule is that I would never leave the engine running and not be
at the controls. Now, if I am flying with another pilot, either of us can get out with the engine running and if PIC is getting out, we have a routine for passing control of the aircraft that we have briefed. I have pilot friends that will run up to hand me something or say something and I have no problem with that, although I am still watching what they are doing and anticipating a brain fart. If I don't know the person approaching my aircraft, or know the person but they aren't a pilot,...engine is off. Just my own personal comfort zone there. Also, if I'm shutting it down in a hurry, it's with the mag switches not the mixture. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:49:00 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote in :: I'll shut down if I think there's a chance they could get near the prop, even if I think they don't intend to do so. Flight instructors soloing student pilots are faced with this issue. It would be interesting to know their personal procedure. Do they leave the student at the controls with the engine running when they send them on their first solo, or require a re-light? If the former, it could unintentionally set a poor precedent for students. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry Dighera wrote: Flight instructors soloing student pilots are faced with this issue. It would be interesting to know their personal procedure. Do they leave the student at the controls with the engine running when they send them on their first solo, or require a re-light? As I recall, mine had me shut down while she got out. George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
... On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:49:00 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in :: I'll shut down if I think there's a chance they could get near the prop, even if I think they don't intend to do so. Flight instructors soloing student pilots are faced with this issue. It would be interesting to know their personal procedure. Do they leave the student at the controls with the engine running when they send them on their first solo, or require a re-light? If the former, it could unintentionally set a poor precedent for students. Mine made me shut down. Jay B |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Beckman wrote:
Mine made me shut down. Excellent! Too often when I'm at an airport with my scanner (RHV or SQL usually) I see a CFI hop out for a student's first solo while the prop is turning. It makes me want to jump up, run over to the plane, and strangle the CFI - and I'm really really not a violent person. It is so irresponsible IMHO. I wonder how many of these prop strike pilots had a CFI that hopped out while the engine was running. You cannot do things with a student, and then tell them not to do it - you need to fly and behave like you want the student to fly and behave (behave == decision making). One day he'll be flying with his wife, fire up the engine, try taxi, realize he's left the chocks on. What does he do? When I solo a student, we taxi to a not busy spot, shutdown, chat about what we had just done, what he/she should do, how it'll feel different without me there, sign the papers, emphasize that go-arounds are good, and to go have fun and fly the numbers. Then I hop out, and the student starts running the checklist(s) from the engine start. Yes, it costs them an extra $5, but let's put things into perspective here. [OK, now that I have that pet peeve off my chest... ![]() Hilton |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 at 18:32:26 in message
. net, Hilton wrote: When I solo a student, we taxi to a not busy spot, shutdown, chat about what we had just done, what he/she should do, how it'll feel different without me there, sign the papers, emphasize that go-arounds are good, and to go have fun and fly the numbers. Then I hop out, and the student starts running the checklist(s) from the engine start. Yes, it costs them an extra $5, but let's put things into perspective here. [OK, now that I have that pet peeve off my chest... ![]() When I had lessons many years ago, it always amazed me (it also made me very careful) that my instructor, from day 1, put his life in my hands by putting me at the controls while he hand propped the engine. He gave clear instructions but I set the throttle while he turned the engine over, then I set things for a start and switched on at the call. If the engine had a miss-start I did as I was told again! When I soloed he got out of the aircraft on the other side of the field with me already lined up for take off (a grass field) with the engine running, and walked back while I flew my circuit. Your method was better, but I finished up extremely wary of turning props. Oh, I should have mentioned that the engine had no starter anyway. -- David CL Francis |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:06:54 GMT, David CL Francis
wrote: When I had lessons many years ago, it always amazed me (it also made me very careful) that my instructor, from day 1, put his life in my hands by putting me at the controls while he hand propped the engine This is still routine, and it still amazes me. Personally, if someone asks me for a prop, I do the job from behind, just as I do when I'm starting the plane away from my home field. That way, I might get run over, but that's survivable. We did have one instructor for a year or two who didn't untie the tail until she had the engine running. Again, the worst that could have happened is that the student taxied off without her. Worse yet, everyone seems to use different language for the calls, which are made by the propper. I like BRAKES--CRACKED--HOT, because it's what my first instructor said, and it does sound urgent. The old timers say BRAKES--CRACKED--CONTACT. And I also hear BRAKES ON AND ON. Whenever my granddaughter sees someone trying to start a lawnmower or such, she cries BRAKES--CRACKED--HOT! -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? | Gus Rasch | Aerobatics | 1 | February 14th 08 10:18 PM |
Ivo Prop on O-320 | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 03:04 AM |
Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 03:22 AM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |
Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop | Larry Smith | Home Built | 21 | September 26th 03 07:45 PM |