A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Seems a little strange-



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 25th 05, 11:15 PM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"jsmith" wrote in message ...
Domestic Reduced Vertical Separation M?? begins at FL280.
Prior to January 20, 2005, vertical separation between aircraft above FL280 was 2000 feet. As of 20 January 2005, the
vertical separation between aircraft at FL280 and above is 1000 feet. Only aircraft properly equipped for DRVSM are
permitted to fly above FL280.


Altimeter accuracy ±65' for current birds and ±130' for older ones. Pretty amazing stuff actually, something like 1/4 of
1%...


  #2  
Old January 26th 05, 01:14 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:15:41 GMT, "Blueskies"
wrote:


"jsmith" wrote in message ...
Domestic Reduced Vertical Separation M?? begins at FL280.
Prior to January 20, 2005, vertical separation between aircraft above FL280 was 2000 feet. As of 20 January 2005, the
vertical separation between aircraft at FL280 and above is 1000 feet. Only aircraft properly equipped for DRVSM are
permitted to fly above FL280.


Altimeter accuracy ±65' for current birds and ±130' for older ones. Pretty amazing stuff actually, something like 1/4 of
1%...


Pretty sure that the ±65' and ±130' tolerance is for the "automatic
altitude control system" in regard to the "acquired altitude" in
"straight and level flight under nonturbulent, nongust conditions". If
there is an altitude select/acquire system, it's tolerance is ±25'
between the selected/displayed altitude and the corresponding signal
to the autopilot.

The tolerance for altimetry error is roughly between ±140' and ±200'.
There is also a requirement for an altitude alerter with a nominal
±200' ±50' (newer aircraft) and ±300' ±50' (older aircraft) alert
threshold.

If these numbers have changed recently, I apologize, am looking at
older reference/study material.

TC
  #3  
Old January 27th 05, 01:00 AM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message ...
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:15:41 GMT, "Blueskies"
wrote:


"jsmith" wrote in message ...
Domestic Reduced Vertical Separation M?? begins at FL280.
Prior to January 20, 2005, vertical separation between aircraft above FL280 was 2000 feet. As of 20 January 2005,
the
vertical separation between aircraft at FL280 and above is 1000 feet. Only aircraft properly equipped for DRVSM are
permitted to fly above FL280.


Altimeter accuracy ±65' for current birds and ±130' for older ones. Pretty amazing stuff actually, something like 1/4
of
1%...


Pretty sure that the ±65' and ±130' tolerance is for the "automatic
altitude control system" in regard to the "acquired altitude" in
"straight and level flight under nonturbulent, nongust conditions". If
there is an altitude select/acquire system, it's tolerance is ±25'
between the selected/displayed altitude and the corresponding signal
to the autopilot.

The tolerance for altimetry error is roughly between ±140' and ±200'.
There is also a requirement for an altitude alerter with a nominal
±200' ±50' (newer aircraft) and ±300' ±50' (older aircraft) alert
threshold.

If these numbers have changed recently, I apologize, am looking at
older reference/study material.

TC


Yup, I looked at the docs again and it looks like you got it right, except the total altimetry system error may not
exceed 120 feet for pre-97 planes and 80 feet for recent birds....


  #4  
Old January 27th 05, 03:28 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You are correct, sir.

Unless it's a non "group" aircaft, then it's 160 feet in the basic
envelope, and 200 feet in the full.

Am thinking I just fulfilled my recurring RVSM training requirements
while on Usenet.

Gotta love those federal regulations...

TC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange Class D boundary??? Roy Smith General Aviation 2 August 30th 04 01:56 PM
Strange engine event Paul Mennen Owning 33 July 9th 04 03:42 AM
Strange one about the 296 kage Piloting 0 June 13th 04 01:42 AM
Strange lost-comm situation Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 6 May 4th 04 03:11 AM
Really strange going-on with radios Roy Smith General Aviation 3 March 15th 04 12:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.