![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jsmith" wrote in message ... Domestic Reduced Vertical Separation M?? begins at FL280. Prior to January 20, 2005, vertical separation between aircraft above FL280 was 2000 feet. As of 20 January 2005, the vertical separation between aircraft at FL280 and above is 1000 feet. Only aircraft properly equipped for DRVSM are permitted to fly above FL280. Altimeter accuracy ±65' for current birds and ±130' for older ones. Pretty amazing stuff actually, something like 1/4 of 1%... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:15:41 GMT, "Blueskies"
wrote: "jsmith" wrote in message ... Domestic Reduced Vertical Separation M?? begins at FL280. Prior to January 20, 2005, vertical separation between aircraft above FL280 was 2000 feet. As of 20 January 2005, the vertical separation between aircraft at FL280 and above is 1000 feet. Only aircraft properly equipped for DRVSM are permitted to fly above FL280. Altimeter accuracy ±65' for current birds and ±130' for older ones. Pretty amazing stuff actually, something like 1/4 of 1%... Pretty sure that the ±65' and ±130' tolerance is for the "automatic altitude control system" in regard to the "acquired altitude" in "straight and level flight under nonturbulent, nongust conditions". If there is an altitude select/acquire system, it's tolerance is ±25' between the selected/displayed altitude and the corresponding signal to the autopilot. The tolerance for altimetry error is roughly between ±140' and ±200'. There is also a requirement for an altitude alerter with a nominal ±200' ±50' (newer aircraft) and ±300' ±50' (older aircraft) alert threshold. If these numbers have changed recently, I apologize, am looking at older reference/study material. TC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:15:41 GMT, "Blueskies" wrote: "jsmith" wrote in message ... Domestic Reduced Vertical Separation M?? begins at FL280. Prior to January 20, 2005, vertical separation between aircraft above FL280 was 2000 feet. As of 20 January 2005, the vertical separation between aircraft at FL280 and above is 1000 feet. Only aircraft properly equipped for DRVSM are permitted to fly above FL280. Altimeter accuracy ±65' for current birds and ±130' for older ones. Pretty amazing stuff actually, something like 1/4 of 1%... Pretty sure that the ±65' and ±130' tolerance is for the "automatic altitude control system" in regard to the "acquired altitude" in "straight and level flight under nonturbulent, nongust conditions". If there is an altitude select/acquire system, it's tolerance is ±25' between the selected/displayed altitude and the corresponding signal to the autopilot. The tolerance for altimetry error is roughly between ±140' and ±200'. There is also a requirement for an altitude alerter with a nominal ±200' ±50' (newer aircraft) and ±300' ±50' (older aircraft) alert threshold. If these numbers have changed recently, I apologize, am looking at older reference/study material. TC Yup, I looked at the docs again and it looks like you got it right, except the total altimetry system error may not exceed 120 feet for pre-97 planes and 80 feet for recent birds.... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are correct, sir.
Unless it's a non "group" aircaft, then it's 160 feet in the basic envelope, and 200 feet in the full. Am thinking I just fulfilled my recurring RVSM training requirements while on Usenet. Gotta love those federal regulations... TC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange Class D boundary??? | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 2 | August 30th 04 01:56 PM |
Strange engine event | Paul Mennen | Owning | 33 | July 9th 04 03:42 AM |
Strange one about the 296 | kage | Piloting | 0 | June 13th 04 01:42 AM |
Strange lost-comm situation | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | May 4th 04 03:11 AM |
Really strange going-on with radios | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 3 | March 15th 04 12:52 PM |