![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 04:34:40 GMT, "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com
wrote in ANAPd.26325$uc.19139@trnddc04:: "Larry Dighera" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 05:18:37 GMT, "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in NkgPd.2805$uc.202@trnddc01:: So it is the thermal emissivity of the wing surface that really matters -- not the molecular conductivity. If the molecular conductivity is unimportant, once the surface changes temperature, how does the rest of the material change temperature without conduction? Go back and read it in context. I didn't say there was no conduction. What I said was (in different words) that conduction is not the process of the wing surface losing thermal energy. Here, I'll put it in another term so you can do some more nit picking: Because the atomosphere is transparent in certain important wavelengths, the heat of the wing is being sucked into outer space. Yes. I understood what you said. And I thank you for the insight into the arcana of IR radiation. However, I believe the question that I posed provides further insight into the RATE of temperature change that we were discussing. Obviously conduction is required to move the heat to the surface. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 04:34:40 GMT, "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in ANAPd.26325$uc.19139@trnddc04:: "Larry Dighera" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 05:18:37 GMT, "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in NkgPd.2805$uc.202@trnddc01:: So it is the thermal emissivity of the wing surface that really matters -- not the molecular conductivity. If the molecular conductivity is unimportant, once the surface changes temperature, how does the rest of the material change temperature without conduction? Go back and read it in context. I didn't say there was no conduction. What I said was (in different words) that conduction is not the process of the wing surface losing thermal energy. Here, I'll put it in another term so you can do some more nit picking: Because the atomosphere is transparent in certain important wavelengths, the heat of the wing is being sucked into outer space. Yes. I understood what you said. And I thank you for the insight into the arcana of IR radiation. However, I believe the question that I posed provides further insight into the RATE of temperature change that we were discussing. Obviously conduction is required to move the heat to the surface. Ahh, now I see your point. You are obviously correct that it is a systemic process. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 29th 04 08:09 PM |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | General Aviation | 0 | April 29th 04 08:09 PM |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Military Aviation | 0 | April 29th 04 06:45 PM |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Home Built | 0 | April 29th 04 06:43 PM |
FA: Raytheon Thermal Imaging Camera - Very Nice! | Michael J. | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 11:23 PM |