![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:15:18 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote: Does the military _ever_ return its airspace to public use?\ Yes. It wouldn't take very long to list all of the military bases closed in the last 25 years, which would quickly relate to a whole bunch of no longer needed airspace and training routes. AVflash Volume 11, Number 7a -- February 14, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------- GA PILOTS TAKE ON MILITARY IN N.M. New Mexico has some wide-open skies, but apparently there is not enough room there for all the military and civilian pilots who want to fly. The U.S. Air Force wants to add 700 square miles to the 2,600 square miles now used by the F-16 Falcons based at Cannon Air Force Base. The airspace expansion would mean rerouting about 40 civilian flights per day, and intrude onto GA routes between Albuquerque and Roswell. "They've grabbed up so much airspace, it's going to be dangerous for small, civilian aircraft," U.S. Pilots Association President Steve Uslan told The Albuquerque Journal. "And that's a long way around, and that means a lot of fuel and a lot of time wasted." http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#189168 First, lets' consider how big the somewhat inflammatory number "700 square miles is in the big picture of all of New Mexico: it's a block 35 miles by 20 miles-- then consider how much airspace it might take to run a 2-v-2 training engagement. Then, recognize that special use airspace comes in a lot of flavors. Some is restricted (which means don't go there without permission), some is prohibited (which means don't go there OR ELSE!), some is warning (which means go there, but be careful), and some is simply advisory. Most military training airspace is open for transit when not in use. In other words, ATC can authorize passage if the area is not "HOT". And, the airspace used for most military training is within positive control, so it only effects IFR traffic on flight plans. Most GA "small, civilian aircraft" (as opposed to corporate) is VFR and below positive control, hence not effected. Poor Steve, he doesn't want to be inconvenienced and he'd rather have those guys and gals who strap their butts into the big iron go to war to protect him without being properly trained. Maybe they need a community relations program at Cannon in which guys like Steve get taken for a ride so they could get a clue. About 30 minutes of air-to-air should do the job. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |