![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When flying forward, the Diskrotor Helicopter disk plane has a positive
pitch angle relative to the ground. The thrust necessary for forward flight is provided by the jet stream and not by the rotor as a conventional helicopter does. A model acc.to your proposal has flown stright and level 5 years ago. The disk airfoil has similar abilities as a conventional airfoil with a partially open split flap, which are surprisingly good. See Ira H. Abbot: Theory of Wing Sections or similar. George wrote in message ... "George Vranek" wrote: helicopters. Please have a look at www.vranek.ch/diskrotor.htm and publish The diskrotor/diskCopter has been discussed here before. The conclusion was that it was impractical and probably impossible. When flying forward, the normal helicopter disk plane has a negative pitch angle relative to the ground. Putting a huge round airfoil up there with a negative pitch angle would make you crash and not fly faster. Not only that, but the disk "airfoil" would not really be a very good airfoil with the same shape on both ends would it. If you disagree, I suggest you build a model and fly it faster than 100 mph and see what happens. Dennis. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I still seriously doubt that such a craft would be practical or even possible. Is there video of this model flying on the net somewhere? In any case, simply adding wings to the side of a helicopter will increase its maximum forward speed significantly without the nead for a heavy disk and complex control systems. Dennis. "George Vranek" wrote: When flying forward, the Diskrotor Helicopter disk plane has a positive pitch angle relative to the ground. The thrust necessary for forward flight is provided by the jet stream and not by the rotor as a conventional helicopter does. A model acc.to your proposal has flown stright and level 5 years ago. The disk airfoil has similar abilities as a conventional airfoil with a partially open split flap, which are surprisingly good. See Ira H. Abbot: Theory of Wing Sections or similar. George wrote in message ... "George Vranek" wrote: helicopters. Please have a look at www.vranek.ch/diskrotor.htm and publish The diskrotor/diskCopter has been discussed here before. The conclusion was that it was impractical and probably impossible. When flying forward, the normal helicopter disk plane has a negative pitch angle relative to the ground. Putting a huge round airfoil up there with a negative pitch angle would make you crash and not fly faster. Not only that, but the disk "airfoil" would not really be a very good airfoil with the same shape on both ends would it. If you disagree, I suggest you build a model and fly it faster than 100 mph and see what happens. Dennis. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am sorry, but there is no video of this model. Nearly each helicopter
company has made trials with adding wings to their machines and all dropped them again. During the hoverig the additional wing acts as a balast only and reduces the hover efficiency of the machine. The heavy disk is able to store a lot of kinetic energy, which allows vertical landing in autorotation. George wrote in message ... I still seriously doubt that such a craft would be practical or even possible. Is there video of this model flying on the net somewhere? In any case, simply adding wings to the side of a helicopter will increase its maximum forward speed significantly without the nead for a heavy disk and complex control systems. Dennis. "George Vranek" wrote: When flying forward, the Diskrotor Helicopter disk plane has a positive pitch angle relative to the ground. The thrust necessary for forward flight is provided by the jet stream and not by the rotor as a conventional helicopter does. A model acc.to your proposal has flown stright and level 5 years ago. The disk airfoil has similar abilities as a conventional airfoil with a partially open split flap, which are surprisingly good. See Ira H. Abbot: Theory of Wing Sections or similar. George wrote in message ... "George Vranek" wrote: helicopters. Please have a look at www.vranek.ch/diskrotor.htm and publish The diskrotor/diskCopter has been discussed here before. The conclusion was that it was impractical and probably impossible. When flying forward, the normal helicopter disk plane has a negative pitch angle relative to the ground. Putting a huge round airfoil up there with a negative pitch angle would make you crash and not fly faster. Not only that, but the disk "airfoil" would not really be a very good airfoil with the same shape on both ends would it. If you disagree, I suggest you build a model and fly it faster than 100 mph and see what happens. Dennis. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Any extra weight, including wings, will act as ballast. The thing is that if you want a fast helicopter, you have to pay for it somehow. That big disk on top of your diskcopter is a heck of a huge ballast too. The simplest way to make a helicopter go faster is to simply increase the rotor rpm. That way, the differential of lift as the helicopter goes faster and faster is less significant than a slower turning rotor. That is, at 400 mph tip speed and at 100 mph forward velocity, you have a 200 mph differential or 50% of the tip speed. At 1000 mph tip speed, you still have a 200 mph differential speed but its only 20% of the tip speed. So in this example, a helicopter with a 1000 mph tip speed could go forward at 250 mph before hitting 50% differential. I'm not sure what the actual tip speed is, but I know that a lot of modern fully articulated systems run at tip speeds just under the speed of sound in order to significantly reduce the chances of ground resonance. Dennis. "George Vranek" wrote: I am sorry, but there is no video of this model. Nearly each helicopter company has made trials with adding wings to their machines and all dropped them again. During the hoverig the additional wing acts as a balast only and reduces the hover efficiency of the machine. The heavy disk is able to store a lot of kinetic energy, which allows vertical landing in autorotation. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... The simplest way to make a helicopter go faster is to simply increase the rotor rpm. That way, the differential of lift as the helicopter goes faster and faster is less significant than a slower turning rotor. That is, at 400 mph tip speed and at 100 mph forward velocity, you have a 200 mph differential or 50% of the tip speed. At 1000 mph tip speed, you still have a 200 mph differential speed but its only 20% of the tip speed. So in this example, a helicopter with a 1000 mph tip speed could go forward at 250 mph before hitting 50% differential. I'm not sure what the actual tip speed is, but I know that a lot of modern fully articulated systems run at tip speeds just under the speed of sound in order to significantly reduce the chances of ground resonance. Dennis. Real helicopters use a tip speed on the order of 700-800 ft/sec (475-545 mph), well below the speed of sound. This has nothing to do with ground resonance. It is driven by blade loads, vibration & stability, and noise at high speeds. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The fully articulated hub design is susceptable to ground resonance when landing. By increasing the rotor speed to just under the speed of sound, that is, so nothing goes faster than the speed of sound even at max forward velocity, the risk of ground resonance when landing is significantly reduced. There are other advantages to speeding up a fully articulated hub, but not flying apart when you land is a big one. Dennis. "mm" wrote: Real helicopters use a tip speed on the order of 700-800 ft/sec (475-545 mph), well below the speed of sound. This has nothing to do with ground resonance. It is driven by blade loads, vibration & stability, and noise at high speeds. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... The fully articulated hub design is susceptable to ground resonance when landing. By increasing the rotor speed to just under the speed of sound, that is, so nothing goes faster than the speed of sound even at max forward velocity, the risk of ground resonance when landing is significantly reduced. There are other advantages to speeding up a fully articulated hub, but not flying apart when you land is a big one. Dennis. You clearly don't know anything about ground resonance. It has little or nothing to do with the blade tip Mach number. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Taiwan to make parts for new Bell military helicopters | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 28th 04 12:12 AM |
FA: The Helicopters Are Coming | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 10th 03 05:53 PM |
OH-58 for Civilian use | pp | Rotorcraft | 10 | July 17th 03 07:53 PM |