![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve R." wrote in message ... Hi Kevin, Glad to know it's not just "me!" ;-) Actually, from what I've read through the years, even the guys out there with full blown PhD's in rotorcraft aerodynamics don't fully understand this stuff so us little peons shouldn't be too embarrassed by the confusion we feel when trying to get a handle on it. So HOW do these things get off the ground? Are they sucked off (PuLEASE!! ![]() or are they blown off? -- Beav Please note my E-mail address is "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com" (with the obvious changes) Beavisland now lives at www.beavisoriginal.co.uk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Beav" wrote in
: "Steve R." wrote in message ... Hi Kevin, Glad to know it's not just "me!" ;-) Actually, from what I've read through the years, even the guys out there with full blown PhD's in rotorcraft aerodynamics don't fully understand this stuff so us little peons shouldn't be too embarrassed by the confusion we feel when trying to get a handle on it. So HOW do these things get off the ground? Are they sucked off (PuLEASE!! ![]() Flight (and many other things in our Universe) make use of measurable and repeatable forces and effects. However, because we can measure a force, it doesn't necessarily mean we know why the force is present or the effect occurs. For example, you can measure how long you're on the Internet with a watch, but I doubt you know exactly how the internet is operating while you're online. Jsut because you don't know, doesn't mean you can't get a computer and get online though. Back to flight - gravity is of course a major force, but the collected scientific knowledge of our species still cannot say exactly what gravity *is* - we know there is a force, we can measure it and predict its effects and make use of it, but we still don't know what it is that causes the force we know as gravity. Same is true for many physical properties of the universe, that's what people like Stephen Hawking are trying to find out - they're looking for a unified theory that will explain what we can measure physically (gravity, lift, drag etc) and what we have observed about atomic structure and behaviour (unfortunately Newtonian physics that we use to achieve flight, don't work at the atomic level). That work continues... So the ability for aircraft to fly simply proves that we can measure and make use of forces - not that we understand why those forces exist or even how they work under all circumstances. For all we know, aircraft may well be sucked and blown off to achieve flight, personally I'd rather know the best way for a pilot to achieve those things ![]() toady. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Toad-Man" wrote in message ... "Beav" wrote in : "Steve R." wrote in message ... Hi Kevin, Glad to know it's not just "me!" ;-) Actually, from what I've read through the years, even the guys out there with full blown PhD's in rotorcraft aerodynamics don't fully understand this stuff so us little peons shouldn't be too embarrassed by the confusion we feel when trying to get a handle on it. So HOW do these things get off the ground? Are they sucked off (PuLEASE!! ![]() Flight (and many other things in our Universe) make use of measurable and repeatable forces and effects. However, because we can measure a force, it doesn't necessarily mean we know why the force is present or the effect occurs. For example, you can measure how long you're on the Internet with a watch, but I doubt you know exactly how the internet is operating while you're online. Jsut because you don't know, doesn't mean you can't get a computer and get online though. Back to flight - gravity is of course a major force, but the collected scientific knowledge of our species still cannot say exactly what gravity *is* - we know there is a force, we can measure it and predict its effects and make use of it, but we still don't know what it is that causes the force we know as gravity. Same is true for many physical properties of the universe, that's what people like Stephen Hawking are trying to find out - they're looking for a unified theory that will explain what we can measure physically (gravity, lift, drag etc) and what we have observed about atomic structure and behaviour (unfortunately Newtonian physics that we use to achieve flight, don't work at the atomic level). That work continues... So the ability for aircraft to fly simply proves that we can measure and make use of forces - not that we understand why those forces exist or even how they work under all circumstances. For all we know, aircraft may well be sucked and blown off to achieve flight, personally I'd rather know the best way for a pilot to achieve those things ![]() Well that's easy, just lie down (and think of England:-) -- Beav Please note my E-mail address is "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com" (with the obvious changes) Beavisland now lives at www.beavisoriginal.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |
Osprey tested in air, at sea, but not in vortex ring state. | Henry J. Cobb | Military Aviation | 17 | December 13th 03 08:50 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |