![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sydney Hoeltzli" wrote in message
... 1) Are there any settings I'm missing which could "tweak" this? Any advice about setting the yoke controls to minimize this? Use the trim, if you aren't already. Also, I think you ought to be able to adjust the control sensitivity somewhere in the game settings (sorry I'm not more specific...'98 was a while ago ![]() 2) We are missing many local airports from our database (St. Louis area). The big Class D and B airports are there, but the smaller GA airports aren't. Is there a freeware or shareware source for smaller airports for FS '98 Don't know. FS2002 has all US airports though. 3) I would like to look at my ground track and flight profile to see how it compares to the track of the instrument approach. I found the "flight analysis" "course tracking", which is a start. But is there a way to scan back along the course? Don't know exactly. The flight recorder in FS2000/2002 (again, can't recall if it's in FS98) allows you to go forward and backward on the flight. I think it might also show a route that was entered in the GPS, for comparison to a specific ground track. 4) Slewing. Often where I want to be is a couple miles from a ground-based navaid which I can specify easily as a lat-long. But when I type "y" for slewing, the plane just spins around and around. Doesn't seem to respond to keyboard controls specified for slewing in different directions. Anyone else have this problem and what's the cure? I haven't seen this. Slewing works as advertised for me. Have you double-checked your key assignments to make sure they didn't get munged somehow? Basically one thing all these questions might amount to is, should we upgrade? We skipped FS 2000 because we heard it was such a system hog. We have a pretty fast, large-memory system now, we just haven't bothered to upgrade. FS2000 *was* a huge system hog. FS2002 is much better. We could upgrade to MSFS 2002 or 2004 but I'd hate to do it if it would mean more airports and better scenery, but the same flight model inaccuracies. The VSI (pitch excursion) aspect of the flight modeling in particular is driving me fairly wild. Not knowing exactly what problems you're having, I can't tell you whether you'll see the same thing in FS2002/04. However, while the airplanes certainly aren't exactly like the real thing, I have not noticed either of the problems you've seen. What does the altimeter show you when the VSI is acting up? Maybe the VSI is just inaccurately simulated (shouldn't be using it as your primary reference anyway, due to the lag in the instrument). The one caveat I can think of is that there are often hassles getting planes made for older versions of MSFS to work with newer versions. You should probably try to verify that you know of a working Cheetah/Tiger model before you bother upgrading. I guess all of the above isn't really that much help. Sorry I didn't have better... Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |