A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Simulators
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hardware suggestions anyone?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 1st 04, 10:11 PM
McCrack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:33:21 -0000, "Angus Lepper"
wrote:


You can use multiple monitors in FS, but not (as far as I'm aware) like
this. However, WideFS and FSUIPC (unfortunately now cheap payware) provide
an excellent solution.


You can use this configuration if you buy a Matrox Perhalia video
card.
  #2  
Old February 4th 04, 10:04 AM
Peter Hovorka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi

Thanks to both of you for the nice reply.

I usually like AMD much more in regard to desktop systems - their
architecture seems a lot 'leaner' to me and I've got much better
experiences with them.

My problems:

- I don't know about the FS-specific performance of INTEL compared to
AMD. That means how do the 32 (and 64) Bit CPUs of both vendors compete
in regard to FS 2004 performance.

- I don't know about the performance differences of the actual ATI
chipsets compared with the NVidias.

Sorry for not making that clear in my first post

Best regards,
Peter

PS: The Parhelia seems a bit weak to me...

  #3  
Old February 4th 04, 09:28 PM
McCrack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 11:04:05 +0100, Peter Hovorka
wrote:

Hi

Thanks to both of you for the nice reply.

I usually like AMD much more in regard to desktop systems - their
architecture seems a lot 'leaner' to me and I've got much better
experiences with them.

My problems:

- I don't know about the FS-specific performance of INTEL compared to
AMD. That means how do the 32 (and 64) Bit CPUs of both vendors compete
in regard to FS 2004 performance.


The AMD Athlon 64 will give you the best performance in games. But an
Intel P4 3.2ghz with 8000mhz FSB will do fine too.

- I don't know about the performance differences of the actual ATI
chipsets compared with the NVidias.


According to benchmarks I saw today the Nvidia Geforce FX 5950 looks
to be the top performer if money is no object. But in games that use
Directx9 pixel shaders it has been shown that the Radeon cards perform
much better, unless that was just a Nvidia driver problem. If you want
the best bang for your buck then get a Radeon 9800pro. The RadeonXT
cards are a bit faster but not enough to warrant the extra bucks.

PS: The Parhelia seems a bit weak to me...


Yea, it is, but it supports triple monitors, the other cards only
support dual monitors.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for Transciever suggestions Lockrdg Piloting 32 July 8th 04 10:49 AM
Destination Suggestions Matt Young Piloting 9 July 5th 04 03:17 AM
Bend, OR (S07) to OSH route suggestions Jack Allison Piloting 4 April 12th 04 09:19 PM
hardware to mount avionics trays Matthew M. Jurotich Home Built 1 November 17th 03 10:56 PM
Need help with hardware Paul Mennen Home Built 8 August 29th 03 03:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.