![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Kuykendall" wrote in message ... Earlier, Mat Redsell wrote: the air going over the top is separating due to the high angle of attack... Sounds like a stalled condition to me. Bob K. Again, not quite. Mat is describing an incipient stall, not a full stall. The PII is under-elevatored with respect to stalling the aircraft but not with respect to achieving CLmax. The Marske PII elevator authority limitation is directly related to the incipient stalling of the wing. At airspeeds above stall, the elevator authority is as large or larger than conventional gliders. But as the incipient stall begins, the elevator authority is sharply limited. (Another way to say this is that there is a large non-linearity in elevator authority that sharply reduces elevator effectiveness as the incipient stall begins.) This is not a linear function of AOA or airspeed. As far as I know, this behavior is unique to plank-type flying wings - particularly those with the elevators on the inboard trailing edge of the wing such as the Marske planform. On the other hand, with a conventional tailed aircraft, there is no link between the elevator authority and the stalling behavior of the wing. In the case of a conventional glider with a horizontal tail located some distance aft of the wing, the wing may be fully stalled or fully flying, or anywhere in between, with no effect on the elevator authority. Depending on the elevator area, up angle limit, airspeed and CG location, the elevator may be able to bring the wing to stall or beyond without the wing stall imposing any limits on the up elevator authority at all. The designer may choose to impose limits on up elevator authority to achieve benign stalling behavior - this is not the case with the Marske planform. As to Mat's report of near zero airspeeds, there are certainly large ASI errors involved and the true airspeed is almost certainly not zero. To get a true reading, Mat would need a nose boom with a gimballing pitot/static probe and a sensitive calibrated ASI. However, there are many reports of special conditions where a spanwise vortex forms above the wing at high AOA preserving a large amount of lift. One prototype of the Velocity canard pusher encountered this phenomenon with the forward wing which resulted in the aircraft settling in a flat attitude at low sink rates. The aircraft was not recoverable from this condition and the test pilot elected to ride it into Tampa Bay at 200FPM sink and lived to tell the tale. The Kasper Wing apparently can do this as well but is recoverable. It would be interesting to see a video of yarn tufts on the upper wing surface to help visualize the flow with near-zero indicated airspeed. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
VP-II wings available in Oregon, USA (Or, "How I was coconuted...") | Roberto Waltman | Home Built | 2 | October 29th 04 04:21 PM |
Charging for Wings safety seminar? | Marty Shapiro | Piloting | 19 | June 23rd 04 05:28 PM |
Stolen "Champ" wings located...from 23,000 feet!! | Tom Pappano | Piloting | 17 | December 15th 03 01:24 PM |
Stall resistant 172? | Roger Long | Piloting | 19 | October 18th 03 11:48 PM |