![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene, we aren't doing ballistics here; we only want
to get close enough for the eyeballs to do the proper adjustments. For badge flights we try to exceed the minimums enough to make up for instrument errors; for record flights we must exceed the current record by a percentage that should account for these relatively minor distances. It's nice that someone is turned on by all this precision; in my mind it has all the usefulness of train spotting with respect to practicality in soaring. At 15:12 28 August 2003, Gene Nygaard wrote: Maybe Eratosthenes still thought the Earth was a near-perfect sphere, when he made a fairly reasonable calculation of its diameter Maybe Columbus wasn't even aware of the true shape of the poles. But we've known about the flattening at the poles for about four centuries at least, probably longer than nautical miles have existed. Certainly since long before the French scientists in the 1790s designed the meter to be 1/10000000 of the distance from the equator to the North Pole. We do, of course, have 360 degrees around the equator. When we agree on a starting point (e.g., the point where it crosses the meridian through Greenwich, England, the one most often used now), any particular place will always be the same number of degrees from it. We also have 90 degrees between the equator and either pole. The equator is always 0 degrees and the poles 90 degrees. But in between, there are at least three different ways of measuring latitude: geocentric latitude (the angle formed at the center of the Earth), geodetic latitude (the one normally used, the angle formed between the line normal to the tangent of the ellipsoid and the axis of rotation), and the angles used in the parametric formulas representing an ellipse. These don't agree with each other at any place not on the equator or the poles. Gene Nygaard http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my line of work we speak of "measuring it with a micrometer, marking it
with a crayon, and then cutting it off with an axe". Bob Korves "Nyal Williams" wrote in message ... Gene, we aren't doing ballistics here; we only want to get close enough for the eyeballs to do the proper adjustments. For badge flights we try to exceed the minimums enough to make up for instrument errors; for record flights we must exceed the current record by a percentage that should account for these relatively minor distances. It's nice that someone is turned on by all this precision; in my mind it has all the usefulness of train spotting with respect to practicality in soaring. At 15:12 28 August 2003, Gene Nygaard wrote: Maybe Eratosthenes still thought the Earth was a near-perfect sphere, when he made a fairly reasonable calculation of its diameter Maybe Columbus wasn't even aware of the true shape of the poles. But we've known about the flattening at the poles for about four centuries at least, probably longer than nautical miles have existed. Certainly since long before the French scientists in the 1790s designed the meter to be 1/10000000 of the distance from the equator to the North Pole. We do, of course, have 360 degrees around the equator. When we agree on a starting point (e.g., the point where it crosses the meridian through Greenwich, England, the one most often used now), any particular place will always be the same number of degrees from it. We also have 90 degrees between the equator and either pole. The equator is always 0 degrees and the poles 90 degrees. But in between, there are at least three different ways of measuring latitude: geocentric latitude (the angle formed at the center of the Earth), geodetic latitude (the one normally used, the angle formed between the line normal to the tangent of the ellipsoid and the axis of rotation), and the angles used in the parametric formulas representing an ellipse. These don't agree with each other at any place not on the equator or the poles. Gene Nygaard http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Add one more, Bob.
Measure with a micrometer, Mark with a crayon, Cut on the safe side, with an axe, Grind to fit! JJ Sinclair |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
got this from a friend | JD | Naval Aviation | 7 | August 31st 03 03:21 AM |