A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Feet Per Minute Conversion Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 28th 03, 05:25 PM
Nyal Williams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gene, we aren't doing ballistics here; we only want
to get close enough for the eyeballs to do the proper
adjustments. For badge flights we try to exceed the
minimums enough to make up for instrument errors; for
record flights we must exceed the current record by
a percentage that should account for these relatively
minor distances.

It's nice that someone is turned on by all this precision;
in my mind it has all the usefulness of train spotting
with respect to practicality in soaring.

At 15:12 28 August 2003, Gene Nygaard wrote:
Maybe Eratosthenes still thought the Earth was a near-perfect
sphere,
when he made a fairly reasonable calculation of its
diameter Maybe
Columbus wasn't even aware of the true shape of the
poles.

But we've known about the flattening at the poles for
about four
centuries at least, probably longer than nautical miles
have existed.
Certainly since long before the French scientists in
the 1790s
designed the meter to be 1/10000000 of the distance
from the equator
to the North Pole.

We do, of course, have 360 degrees around the equator.
When we agree
on a starting point (e.g., the point where it crosses
the meridian
through Greenwich, England, the one most often used
now), any
particular place will always be the same number of
degrees from it.

We also have 90 degrees between the equator and either
pole. The
equator is always 0 degrees and the poles 90 degrees.
But in between,
there are at least three different ways of measuring
latitude:
geocentric latitude (the angle formed at the center
of the Earth),
geodetic latitude (the one normally used, the angle
formed between the
line normal to the tangent of the ellipsoid and the
axis of rotation),
and the angles used in the parametric formulas representing
an
ellipse. These don't agree with each other at any
place not on the
equator or the poles.

Gene Nygaard
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/




  #2  
Old August 29th 03, 01:26 AM
Bob Korves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In my line of work we speak of "measuring it with a micrometer, marking it
with a crayon, and then cutting it off with an axe".
Bob Korves

"Nyal Williams" wrote in message
...
Gene, we aren't doing ballistics here; we only want
to get close enough for the eyeballs to do the proper
adjustments. For badge flights we try to exceed the
minimums enough to make up for instrument errors; for
record flights we must exceed the current record by
a percentage that should account for these relatively
minor distances.

It's nice that someone is turned on by all this precision;
in my mind it has all the usefulness of train spotting
with respect to practicality in soaring.

At 15:12 28 August 2003, Gene Nygaard wrote:
Maybe Eratosthenes still thought the Earth was a near-perfect
sphere,
when he made a fairly reasonable calculation of its
diameter Maybe
Columbus wasn't even aware of the true shape of the
poles.

But we've known about the flattening at the poles for
about four
centuries at least, probably longer than nautical miles
have existed.
Certainly since long before the French scientists in
the 1790s
designed the meter to be 1/10000000 of the distance
from the equator
to the North Pole.

We do, of course, have 360 degrees around the equator.
When we agree
on a starting point (e.g., the point where it crosses
the meridian
through Greenwich, England, the one most often used
now), any
particular place will always be the same number of
degrees from it.

We also have 90 degrees between the equator and either
pole. The
equator is always 0 degrees and the poles 90 degrees.
But in between,
there are at least three different ways of measuring
latitude:
geocentric latitude (the angle formed at the center
of the Earth),
geodetic latitude (the one normally used, the angle
formed between the
line normal to the tangent of the ellipsoid and the
axis of rotation),
and the angles used in the parametric formulas representing
an
ellipse. These don't agree with each other at any
place not on the
equator or the poles.

Gene Nygaard
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/






  #3  
Old August 29th 03, 03:29 AM
JJ Sinclair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Add one more, Bob.

Measure with a micrometer,

Mark with a crayon,

Cut on the safe side, with an axe,

Grind to fit!
JJ Sinclair
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) Guy Alcala Military Aviation 3 August 13th 04 12:18 PM
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing zxcv Military Aviation 55 April 4th 04 07:05 AM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 02:54 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM
got this from a friend JD Naval Aviation 7 August 31st 03 03:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.