Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:23:21 GMT, Juan Jimenez wrote:

Get real, Corky. This argument wouldn't stand up in a third grade debate
class. I've got a piece of paper in a book here in my library that says it
is the US Constitution, but it's a forgery. The content is quite accurate.
The same goes for the documents that CBS presented. The memos are
forgeries, but the contents are very accurate, as verified by the secretary
who worked for YEARS with Killian.

Ah HA HA HA HA HA, oh man, thanks for a good laugh. Once again, your
words are prophetic: You are absolutely correct, your argument will
not stand up even in a third grade debate.

No one knows if the content of the memos is accurate or not. We have
the testimony of an 86 year old woman who has stated that the memo's
are definately fake. She conjectured that in her opinion, they
accurately reflect the sentiment of her boss. In a court of law, this
type of testimony is called "hearsay" evidence and is not allowed
because it's opinion, not verifiable fact. Your third graders would
recognize that even if you do not.

In order for the documents to be
accepted as evidence, they MUST be the originals, and must be
verifiable by anyone's expert.

Wrong.

Well apparently CBS does not agree with you.

CBS is publically eating crow because everyone on earth knows this.
Except you.

Wrong again! ding! That's two strikes, care to take another futile swing?

Here's a couple of paragraphs from AP television writer David Bauder:

"NEW YORK - CBS News apologized Monday for a "mistake in judgment" in
its story questioning President Bush (news - web sites)'s National
Guard service, claiming it was misled by the source of documents that
several experts have dismissed as fakes.

The network said it would appoint an independent panel to look at its
reporting about the memos. The story has mushroomed into a major media
scandal, threatening the reputations of CBS News and chief anchor Dan
Rather."

Further: "Based on what we now know, CBS News cannot prove that the
documents are authentic, which is the only acceptable journalistic
standard to justify using them in the report," Heyward said. "We
should not have used them."

CBS says it was an error in judgement to use the memo's because they
could not be authenticated, and at HUGE expense to their nationwide
and worldwide news reporting reputation, they publically apologized.
But Juan Jimenez says it's ok to use the information anyway. Why am I
not surprised?

Corky (your words reveal your ethics) Scott

Corky Scott wrote in
:

Ah HA HA HA HA HA, oh man, thanks for a good laugh.

Easily amused, the mark of a someone who walks into a battle of wits,
unarmed.

No one knows if the content of the memos is accurate or not.

Wrong again. Marian Carr Knox knows. Keep swinging, you're bound to hit the
ball sometime this week.

We have the testimony of an 86 year old woman who has stated that the
memo's are definately fake.

And we have the testimony of the _same_ 86 year old woman who stated (not
conjectured, not opined, not surmised, not imagined):

"However, the information in those is correct."

Well apparently CBS does not agree with you.

ROFL! You wish!

Further: "Based on what we now know, CBS News cannot prove that the
documents are authentic, which is the only acceptable journalistic
standard to justify using them in the report," Heyward said. "We
should not have used them."

Exactly. Thank you so much for walking right into that one and proving my
point beyond a shadow of a doubt, They said they cannot prove the documents
are authentic, not that the content of the documents are false.

Keep swinging! Maybe next week, kiddo!

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:31:33 GMT, Juan Jimenez wrote:

Exactly. Thank you so much for walking right into that one and proving my
point beyond a shadow of a doubt, They said they cannot prove the documents
are authentic, not that the content of the documents are false.

Keep swinging! Maybe next week, kiddo!

I don't think so. I'm taking my own advice which I've offered many
times before in regards anyone attempting intelligent conversation
with you and halting my participation.

Corky Scott

Jimenez wrote:

Exactly. Thank you so much for walking right into that one and proving my
point beyond a shadow of a doubt, They said they cannot prove the documents
are authentic, not that the content of the documents are false.

Keep swinging! Maybe next week, kiddo!

I don't think so. I'm taking my own advice which I've offered many
times before in regards anyone attempting intelligent conversation
with you and halting my participation.

Corky Scott


Just do what I did, set the filter to eliminate him!

FLUSH the **** down the toilet.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

osite (RobertR237) wrote in
:

FLUSH the **** down the toilet.

No, Bob! Don't do it! Don't commit suicide! Not yet, anyway! We haven't
found a replacement for your RAH Court Jester job yet! chuckle

Corky Scott wrote in
:

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:31:33 GMT, Juan Jimenez wrote:

Exactly. Thank you so much for walking right into that one and proving
my point beyond a shadow of a doubt, They said they cannot prove the
documents are authentic, not that the content of the documents are
false.

Keep swinging! Maybe next week, kiddo!

I don't think so. I'm taking my own advice which I've offered many
times before in regards anyone attempting intelligent conversation
with you and halting my participation.

Oh, poor baby, Corky loses the debate and now decides to go home and throw
a tantrum? Tsk tsk...