![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Todd,
You seem to be of the opinion that in the accelerated part at the start of the pull-up the ballasted glider has a vast advantage over the un-ballasted one. Have you any evidence to support this? I would have thought that the effort required to accelerate the extra ballast would give the advantage to the light glider at this point - but yes that's just my opinion. As far as I'm concerned the overwhelming maths here is good ol' conservation of energy where speed is traded for height & the two come out equal. Yes there's some drag involved but the actual drag forces are pretty small on modern sailplanes & the time in which they have to operate is pretty small. Three questions for you:- 1) How long do you think the pull-up lasts? 2) What sort of difference do you think there is in the respective sink rates - during the pull, during the climb & the push over at the top? 3) What sort of difference do you think there is in the height gained? Finally I've suggested a couple of times that someone with a Duo / ASH25 / Nimbus D go & do the tests At 15:42 18 September 2003, Todd Pattist wrote: Kevin Neave wrote: The heavy glider is indeed losing height more slowly than the light one at this speed, (But the difference is only about 1m/s). Where do you get that number? From the polar measured at 1G? That's the wrong polar. The glider is not operating at 1 G for much of the pullup. This difference is only maintained for the duration of the pullup (About 4-5 seconds) and will be diminishing as the speeds drop off. I regret to say that this analysis is bogus. It just tells us what would happen if the gliders flew side by side for 4-5 seconds. Of course that difference is nominal, but they aren't doing that, they are flying at a varying G-load through the pullup. You can't wave your hands and ignore that difference. So in the end I believe it's too close to call!! You have no basis other than your opinion. You need to do the math or the experiment. You've done neither. Todd Pattist - 'WH' Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|