A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I wish I'd never got into this...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 18th 03, 06:04 PM
Kevin Neave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Todd,

You seem to be of the opinion that in the accelerated
part at the start of the pull-up the ballasted glider
has a vast advantage over the un-ballasted one. Have
you any evidence to support this? I would have thought
that the effort required to accelerate the extra ballast
would give the advantage to the light glider at this
point - but yes that's just my opinion.

As far as I'm concerned the overwhelming maths here
is good ol' conservation of energy where speed is traded
for height & the two come out equal.

Yes there's some drag involved but the actual drag
forces are pretty small on modern sailplanes & the
time in which they have to operate is pretty small.


Three questions for you:-

1) How long do you think the pull-up lasts?
2) What sort of difference do you think there is in
the respective sink rates - during the pull, during
the climb & the push over at the top?
3) What sort of difference do you think there is in
the height gained?

Finally I've suggested a couple of times that someone
with a Duo / ASH25 / Nimbus D go & do the tests

At 15:42 18 September 2003, Todd Pattist wrote:
Kevin Neave
wrote:

The heavy glider is indeed losing height more slowly
than the light one at this speed, (But the difference
is only about 1m/s).


Where do you get that number? From the polar measured
at
1G? That's the wrong polar. The glider is not operating
at
1 G for much of the pullup.

This difference is only maintained for the duration
of the pullup (About 4-5 seconds) and will be diminishing
as the speeds drop off.


I regret to say that this analysis is bogus. It just
tells
us what would happen if the gliders flew side by side
for
4-5 seconds. Of course that difference is nominal,
but they
aren't doing that, they are flying at a varying G-load
through the pullup. You can't wave your hands and
ignore
that difference.

So in the end I believe it's too close to call!!


You have no basis other than your opinion. You need
to do
the math or the experiment. You've done neither.

Todd Pattist - 'WH' Ventus C
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.