![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would not know how to address the "turbo" sustainer vs Self Launch
decision making process. For me it was a no brainer... here in Hawaii I have no option it is either self launch or shuffleboard. I had many of the same questions that you had... I joined the users group for the design and followed the comments of the users. Also I spoke with High Country Soaring which has become known as specializing in repairing motor gliders. The technician mentioned that for a number of reasons that stuff falls off of the 2 stroke engines mostly from vibration issues. All of the designs work well from what I can see, some designs will need constant maintenance or more tweeking to keep flying than others. It appears from what I was able to research that the ASH 26 E with the wankle engine is quite a bit less trouble. Probably part in due to less vibration, it does have some heat issues in some conditions but overall seems to be best of breed from what research I have done. I was told that when you see the quality of an ASH 26 E you will "Know"... and yes I saw the design and for me it was apparent. I ordered one. By the way... when I was at Minden recently I saw a lot of self launchers take off while I was waiting for a tow plane. I think that they may know something. All the ships look beautiful from the air... the closer you get to the -26 E the prettier it gets in fact I think it is the second most beautiful sight I have seen "my better half being the first". Back to the sustainer issue... in marginal conditions you do have the option of taking out the engine. I hear it takes about an hour. But in real life I have a feeling that in light air the thermalling speed difference of 47 kts to 51 for the higher wing loading with the engine in place that the extra weight would not be the end of the world. I also think that 10 minutes of power to get back up... for every down cycle would be worth the price of admission. Steve "John Mason" wrote in message ... I intend to buy a state of the art new glider and I was looking at this choice. My main priority is to enjoy the flying and so I want good performance, nice handling and safe behaviour (no incipient spin tendency to keep me on edge). I am not sure if I will loose a lot of climb performance if I go for a self launcher as they are clearly heavier than a turbo, is the convenience worth loosing the advantage of the low min weight? I Am flying in the UK mainly and so small feeble thermals are the rule. Can those who have flown these aircraft please let me have their comments and help with my decision. Thanks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ventus C vs B | tango4 | Soaring | 6 | September 10th 03 03:29 AM |