![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gonna take a California Governor-sized battery and alternator combo down there
in the nuclear engine room! Using my handy-dandy winch horsepower spreadsheet, solving for required launching force is an incredible 218,000 pounds and over 50,000 horsepower! Of course the engines are in full AB, but still --- Other numbers are a "ground run" of 306 ft and a peak acceleration of 3.3G in 2.4 sec. I can see that they have already provided the Super Hornet with a pretty stout nosegear. That's where their "cg hook" is, I believe. BJ Bill Daniels wrote: Actually, I read somewhere that the US Navy is converting its steam catapults to linear electric motors to get finer control over the launch. I also suspect that it reduces the manpower required to operate the "cat". Bill Daniels "Bob Johnson" wrote in message ... Hi Bruce -- That's a very welcome correction to my hazily-remembered version of a second-hand report of what the 454 c.i. engine torque/hp/rpm chart looks like. This is the kind of info I was looking for and thanks for providing it! In all our past kicking around of the ideal winch prime mover, here's one that sounds silly but might rate at least an engineering investigation -- a recip steam engine! If I recall correctly, the steam engine develops max torque at stall. What got me thinking about that was the fact that the Navy gets 66,000 lb Super Hornets flying in about the same three seconds that it takes us to get airborne. And they do it with steam, not because it's handy, but that's probably the only practical way to get it done. BJ Bruce Hoult wrote: In article , Bob Johnson wrote: Our engine is petrol fueled. Despite Google's best efforts, I have not yet located a Torque/HP/RPM curve for our very common 7.4 L engine, but have heard that it develops max torque and HP at about 3000 RPM and further that the curves are fairly flat at this point. You are making some totally contradictory and inconsistent claims there. If max torque and max HP occur close together then they must both drop off precipitously after that. If the torque curve is flat then HP will be increasing linearly with RPM, max torque and max HP will be very far apart. It is quite likely that you do have maximum torque at around 3000 RPM, but if for example the torque curve is flat enough that the torque at the 5000 RPM redline is still 60% or more of that at 3000 RPM then that (redline) is exactly where maximum power will be. -- Bruce |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
using winch instead of aerotow | goneill | Soaring | 5 | August 27th 03 02:46 PM |