![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't understand clearly what is the problem at Dunstable. What is the
length of runway ahead of you when you reach 150m? Simple answer is not really enough when launching in flat calm conditions which aggravate matters in 2 ways 1) Lack of wind reduces the overall height gained by upto 30% which means you will be substantially further down the field @ 150ft. 2) Lack of headwind means that the landing will be longer. 10kts of wind changes everything and produces a reasonable overlap. The ordinance survey shows the field at about 1k in length As for runway we are a grass field which is far from level. "Robert Ehrlich" wrote in message ... "W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.)." wrote: ... There is a lot to be said for using a motor-glider for teaching aerotow landing options, though JJ won't like this idea! I agree with JJ's opinion. My computation identified the minumum of Vz*V as an important factor in the possibility of turning back, and this values is usually much higher in a motor-glider, due to higher wing loading and worse aerodynamic. ... As to wire launch failures at Dunstable, yes there is often a very narrow gap between being too low to turn and too high to get in straight ahead. I don't understand clearly what is the problem at Dunstable. What is the length of runway ahead of you when you reach 150m? ... Often the field is partly blocked by gliders awaiting retrieve, and tractors on their way to do the retrieve. In this case, if they don't allow a sufficient free space to land in case of a cable break, you should delay the start. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Haley wrote:
I don't understand clearly what is the problem at Dunstable. What is the length of runway ahead of you when you reach 150m? Simple answer is not really enough when launching in flat calm conditions which aggravate matters in 2 ways 1) Lack of wind reduces the overall height gained by upto 30% which means you will be substantially further down the field @ 150ft. 2) Lack of headwind means that the landing will be longer. 10kts of wind changes everything and produces a reasonable overlap. The ordinance survey shows the field at about 1k in length I was talking of 150m, not 150ft. If your 1k length is also in feet, this is pretty short (~ 300m), i.e. the winch is probably far beyond the landable area, which is unusual. If it is 1km, even if you had a very poor climb and you are at mid field (500m) at 150m, 500m seems highly sufficient in any condition of wind for a landing straight ahead. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
using winch instead of aerotow | goneill | Soaring | 5 | August 27th 03 02:46 PM |