![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"W.J. \(Bill\) Dean \(U.K.\)." wrote in message ...
The initial acceleration for a car or reverse pulley launch is no worse than for an aerotow; it is flown in the same way. There is of course no tug slipstream to contend with. A car launch starts like an aerotow, and turns into a winch launch when you are airborne. W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). Remove "ic" to reply. "Chris Nicholas" wrote in message ... Initial acceleration is certainly much slower with autotow (whether pulley or direct) than with winching. At both North Weald and Aston Down there was more than one runway, so most launches were broadly into-wind. Such cross wind as there was could be handled. The initial ground run was a phase of flight in its own right - the pilot had to learn to balance on the wheel and taxi straight until flying speed was achieved. Wingdrop was not normally a problem, but training people to taxi was a feature. The same considerations apply when landing, in any case, so they got two lots of taxi training in one flight. On tarmac or concrete the F250 trucks had adequate power and grip. F100's were not bad, but we didn't have such heavy gliders in those days. Aston Down tried a variety of tow vehicles over the years, including some home-built diesel dragsters, but I believe they ended up with factory-built trucks, as we did, and as Lasham (using straight autotow at one time) also did. I worked for Ford then, and helped to get some advantageous prices for imported US-built vehicles for two if not all three clubs IIRC - Ford used gliders at North Weald as background for some advertisements, and did us a favour in return. My club used LPG rather than petrol/gasoline, which made it a comparable fuel cost to diesel winching, per launch/cable-retrieve. Total depreciation/financing cost was probably about comparable, but needed less cash flow up front. Trucks were cheaper capital cost than new winches, though not as durable - ours lasted for about 50,000 launches each and were not fully worn out - we recycled one old powertrain into a winch when we had to adopt that method for our Ridgewell site. The key features for us at North Weald were that on hard runways we had to use piano wire (single strand steel cable), not stranded, to avoid too much wear and cable cost, and pulley/autotow lends itself to that better, with pulley giving also the benefit of fast launch rate when well organised. We did about 9,000 launches a year, and added considerably to our cash flow, when we had optimised the system. Chris N. It was the Dublin Gliding Club which used reverse pulley launching in Ireland up to the early 1970s. I flew there, from Baldonnel airfield. The pulley was about 3feet in diameter and very simple with hardly any fairing. It was mounted on the back of a large Chrysler car which had a tow-beam coming out of the front with a heavy metal spike at right angles that was embedded in the ground to anchor it. The mount for the pulley allowed it to rotate to any angle to follow the line of the cable. The cable was single strand piano wire. The concrete runways would have worn out stranded cable too quickly. The tow car, a large American automatic transmission car, had a standard cable release mechanism welded to a lever which compressed a small plastic football filled with water connected to a clear plastic tube leading in to the top of the dashboard. The water rose in the tube as the tension in the cable increased. Marks indicated the right pressure for single seaters and two seaters (we flew K7, K13, K8, K6 mainly). The launch driver technique was very simple. Accelerate rapidly to the correct tension once the glider was established in climb. Slow down or speed up to keep the tension on the mark. I don't remember ever having to signal too slow or too fast from the glider. When the wind was strong, it was possible to reverse down the runway, paying out the cable, as the glider kited upwards. My highest launch was 4500 feet using this approach. Cable breaks took rather a long time to disentangle as the cable sprang back and tied itself in knots. Good heavy gloves were useful. Splices were carried out by two people standing opposite each other and winding the free ends back over the wire by hand. The end came when the Army Air Corps installed VASI instrument landing lights at the ends of the runways. The runway lights had been expensive to replace if hit by flying rings, but the VASI lights were £20,000 each and would have meant bankruptcy. The Dublin Gliding Club still launches by (straight) car tow from beaches in County Kerry each year on their wave safaris, using parafil cable. Frank Dobbs Ulster Gliding Club, Northern Ireland |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
vortex ring state at any point during an auto?? | Greg Johnson | Rotorcraft | 18 | August 30th 04 09:12 PM |
Auto Fuel Residue | Stu Gotts | Restoration | 4 | May 12th 04 08:52 PM |
Auto conversions & gear boxes | Dave Covert | Home Built | 56 | April 1st 04 06:19 PM |
Arrow auto gear extension oddness | Roy Smith | Owning | 10 | March 8th 04 02:27 AM |
VOR & Reverse Sensing | mrwallace | Piloting | 1 | August 21st 03 03:08 AM |