A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Briegleb 12B - Opinions?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 5th 03, 04:12 PM
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Earlier, someone named Al wrote:

Did'nt one of these come apart about
4 years ago when the flaps failed and
seperated inflight
the pilot a young man was killed IIRC.


Yes, it's a matter of public record. It was one of three fatal BG-12
inflight failures in the last few years. The accidents of note a

http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...12X21782&key=1

http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...08X08572&key=1

http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...08X07996&key=1

The first of those three is the one "Al" cites. The NTSB determined
that the probable cause was excess speed beyond the flap deployment
speed. I worked at the 2003 Standard Nationals with the late pilot's
father, and our conversations had no small impact on my way of
thinking about the safety and nature of homebuilt soaring.

The second accident was due to the failure of a control push-pull tube
element on a ferry flight, the impending nature of which would
probably have been evident even in a very casual inspection. One of
the conditions of the ferry permit was an inspection of the aircraft
by an A&P or similar, but there was no evidence that the inspection
was performed.

The third accident was a wing separation after several pitch
excursions at relatively high speed. The aircraft was substantially
heavier than max gross, with a CG out of the aft end of the CG
envelope.

Dont buy this junk there are better ships
out there that are less dangerous.
These 60/70's homebuilts are cheap
for a reason pay some more and live
longer!!


There are also better ships out there that are more expensive and
_more_ dangerous.

But that aside, I have to agree with the general consesus that the
social and economic landscape of soaring has changed so that many
homebuilt gliders are very far out of their original context. These
days, a walk through the ocean of most souls would scarcely get your
feet wet.

Thanks, and best regards to all

Bob K.
http://www.hpaircraft.com/hp-24
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 john szpara Owning 55 April 2nd 04 09:08 PM
Opinions wanted ArtKramr Military Aviation 65 January 21st 04 04:15 AM
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION ArtKramr Military Aviation 4 January 7th 04 10:43 PM
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions R. Wubben Owning 2 October 16th 03 05:39 AM
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions R. Wubben Piloting 2 October 16th 03 05:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.