![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian, I thought your "aux vaches" was the M in Nimbus4DM......
Robert Ian Strachan wrote: In article , Bob Johnson writes Just to keep stuff straight, while Mr. Moffat has certainly expessed from time to time his fondness for span, I believe "there is no substitute for span" quote comes from Michael Bird ("Platypus") I do not think that Plat would claim credit for this saying which, regarding straight performance, has been extant in gliding since I started in the 1950s. It refers to the "easiest way to increase performance" (max L/D I suppose), contrasting the relative simplicity of adding span compared to the complexities of adding flaps, new airfoil sections, new configurations, etc. In my own case I remember the Grunau (about 13m I think), good in a thermal but not in a glide, a sort of ancient PW-5. After the Grunau, I progressed through the 15m Meise (well the UK Olympia version anyway) to the Skylark 2 (laminar 15m) to the Skylark 3 & 4 (18m) and finally through various syndicates from 15 to 18m to the Nimbus series, starting at 22m and now 26 in the Nimbus 4DM, twice the span of the dear old Grunau. As far as I am concerned, "there is no substitute for span". In UK soaring conditions, anyway, if you wish to avoid landing "aux vaches". Our vaches may not be very vicious but our roads (for retrieving) are ....... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sailplanes for sale | Jerry Marshall | Soaring | 1 | October 21st 03 03:51 AM |