![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also has the highest consumption of Spam per capita in America but Honolulu
is rated by Men's Health magazine as the leanest city in America. "Steve B" wrote in message om... Tom... thanks for your suggestion. Could you kindly do me a big favor. I am putting together a presentation and need specific examples of motorgliders operating out of Towered Airports and also single runway airports. I am having a hard time finding specific examples to use in the proposal. I will need to present the proposal next Wed and so I am a bit behind the curve. FSDO is being very helpful but we need some ammunition to slay the dragon (airport manager) with. I wish to show other locations where self launch sailplans / motorgliders are able to any of the following: Safely and effeciently mix with other airtraffic and airlines Operate on Airports that have a Tower Operate at Airports that have a Single Runway A short story including which airport and type of motorglider mixing with the air traffic and taxi operations. This is Hawaii... and still a third world country where they shoot first and ask questions later. It is also one of the top two states for corruption, Louisiana being the other. That said... Tower guy and Airport Manager have used the safety and efficency route to stall the ability for me to fly there. It is just a hurdle that need to be cleared. Mahalo Steve Barnes (Tom Seim) wrote in message . com... Steve, DON'T ASK PERMISSION FOR SOMETHING THAT YOU ALREADY HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO! Part of this is JUST DOING IT and getting comfortable with the system. Have I made my point? If you go to these guys uncertain about your rights they are going to trample all over you (maybe not, but why risk it?). At the very least, they will start imposing restrictions on you that they dream up on the spot. I have flown my MG out of a number of tower controlled A/Ps without problems, including Class B. The simplist situation is to launch out of a uncontrolled A/P and land at the controlled A/P using standard radio procedure. On initial contact (outside of the control zone) use the term "glider", not "motorglider" (I assume you will not be under power). This automatically gives you priority over virtually all other A/C (unless there is another glider, of course). You can then, generously, allow other powered A/C to land as normal (assuming you have sufficient altitude-once I didn't and I ****ed off the controller, but that's another story-BTW, your safety preempts controller's atitudes). This eliminates the A/P access situation. I have also showed up with my glider and requested access to the A/P. Once they realize you have an N number and a radio they become acceptive and helpful. If you hesitate in ANY WAY they will become suspicious. Hey, this is their job. Flying in as a powered GA A/C is Ok, but unnecessary. If you don't know the A/P layout ask for a "progressive taxi". The controllers know this lingo and will bend over backwards to cooperate. Tom Seim DG-400 Richland, WA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve,
No doubt my best example is Hailey, ID, which serves Sun Valley. I have flown out of this A/P for nearly 20 years, starting with an ASW19 and later with my DG-400. Hailey is the 2nd busiest A/P in Idaho (after Boise). It has a single runway in a valley surrounded by mountains. There is A LOT of heavy metal flying into and out of Hailey because of Sun Valley (Warren Buffet, Arnold, etc.). When I first started flying there it was uncontrolled. About 1990 they added a control tower, which really helped (I once had to cut off a Cessna - Citation that is). Glider ops stopped there a few years ago after the commercial operator left, but there was never a safety issue. My main confusion was the difference between cleared to the hold line and holding on the runway (you REALLY want clearance for departure when you take a runway that might be seeing a G5 landing at 130 kt!). That part is really understanding the lingo of the controllers. Other tower controlled A/Ps I have operated out of include Pasco, WA, Pendleton, OR, Walla Walla, WA, Felts Field, WA, Geiger (Spokane), WA, Clarkston, ID and Missoula, MT. The key to integrating into regular A/P operations is to behave like a regular GA aircraft: no special requirements. Generally, this means the ability to taxi w/o assistance (some MGs can't do this, i.e. Ventus and Nimbus). If you can land and taxi off the runway w/o power then you don't present a problem to the controllers. This requires consistent energy management, i.e. hitting a touchdown point within a 100 feet. If absolutely necessary you can land w/power (POH permitting). I avoid this because this requires an in-air restart; what if it doesn't start? Then you have an emergency. Let me know if you have any other questions (tom_systek AT MSN dot COM). Tom (Steve B) wrote in message . com... Tom... thanks for your suggestion. Could you kindly do me a big favor. I am putting together a presentation and need specific examples of motorgliders operating out of Towered Airports and also single runway airports. I am having a hard time finding specific examples to use in the proposal. I will need to present the proposal next Wed and so I am a bit behind the curve. FSDO is being very helpful but we need some ammunition to slay the dragon (airport manager) with. I wish to show other locations where self launch sailplans / motorgliders are able to any of the following: Safely and effeciently mix with other airtraffic and airlines Operate on Airports that have a Tower Operate at Airports that have a Single Runway A short story including which airport and type of motorglider mixing with the air traffic and taxi operations. This is Hawaii... and still a third world country where they shoot first and ask questions later. It is also one of the top two states for corruption, Louisiana being the other. That said... Tower guy and Airport Manager have used the safety and efficency route to stall the ability for me to fly there. It is just a hurdle that need to be cleared. Mahalo Steve Barnes (Tom Seim) wrote in message . com... Steve, DON'T ASK PERMISSION FOR SOMETHING THAT YOU ALREADY HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO! Part of this is JUST DOING IT and getting comfortable with the system. Have I made my point? If you go to these guys uncertain about your rights they are going to trample all over you (maybe not, but why risk it?). At the very least, they will start imposing restrictions on you that they dream up on the spot. I have flown my MG out of a number of tower controlled A/Ps without problems, including Class B. The simplist situation is to launch out of a uncontrolled A/P and land at the controlled A/P using standard radio procedure. On initial contact (outside of the control zone) use the term "glider", not "motorglider" (I assume you will not be under power). This automatically gives you priority over virtually all other A/C (unless there is another glider, of course). You can then, generously, allow other powered A/C to land as normal (assuming you have sufficient altitude-once I didn't and I ****ed off the controller, but that's another story-BTW, your safety preempts controller's atitudes). This eliminates the A/P access situation. I have also showed up with my glider and requested access to the A/P. Once they realize you have an N number and a radio they become acceptive and helpful. If you hesitate in ANY WAY they will become suspicious. Hey, this is their job. Flying in as a powered GA A/C is Ok, but unnecessary. If you don't know the A/P layout ask for a "progressive taxi". The controllers know this lingo and will bend over backwards to cooperate. Tom Seim DG-400 Richland, WA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve:
As others have mentioned, you don't need permission to operate at a towered ariport provided you comply with all the appropriate FARs. However, you may need forgiveness if you disrupt the orderly flow of traffic at a busy airport! Scottsdale Arizona (KSDL) is reportedly the busiest single-runway airport in the country, with a considerable number of general aviation and business jet aircraft as well as helicopters. There are at least two motor gliders who are based at or use the airport. In fact, one joined in behind me in the pattern a couple of days ago (I was pounding holes in the asphalt with a Cezzna). We were both put on a circuitous route to land with 360s and extended downwinds to clear jet traffic. ATC treated us both the same (and extremely well, I might add). These aircraft are all motorgliders with the ability to taxi and manoever under power on landing (Katana, Grob 109, etc). I can see considerable difficulties in landing an unpowered glider at a busy airport just from the disruption in traffic and the need to get personnel on the runaway to clear the aircraft. At less busy airports this should not be a problem but obviously needs the cooperation of airport management and staff. Mike ASW 20 WA "Steve B" wrote in message om... Tom... thanks for your suggestion. Could you kindly do me a big favor. I am putting together a presentation and need specific examples of motorgliders operating out of Towered Airports and also single runway airports. I am having a hard time finding specific examples to use in the proposal. I will need to present the proposal next Wed and so I am a bit behind the curve. FSDO is being very helpful but we need some ammunition to slay the dragon (airport manager) with. I wish to show other locations where self launch sailplans / motorgliders are able to any of the following: Safely and effeciently mix with other airtraffic and airlines Operate on Airports that have a Tower Operate at Airports that have a Single Runway A short story including which airport and type of motorglider mixing with the air traffic and taxi operations. This is Hawaii... and still a third world country where they shoot first and ask questions later. It is also one of the top two states for corruption, Louisiana being the other. That said... Tower guy and Airport Manager have used the safety and efficency route to stall the ability for me to fly there. It is just a hurdle that need to be cleared. Mahalo Steve Barnes (Tom Seim) wrote in message . com... Steve, DON'T ASK PERMISSION FOR SOMETHING THAT YOU ALREADY HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO! Part of this is JUST DOING IT and getting comfortable with the system. Have I made my point? If you go to these guys uncertain about your rights they are going to trample all over you (maybe not, but why risk it?). At the very least, they will start imposing restrictions on you that they dream up on the spot. I have flown my MG out of a number of tower controlled A/Ps without problems, including Class B. The simplist situation is to launch out of a uncontrolled A/P and land at the controlled A/P using standard radio procedure. On initial contact (outside of the control zone) use the term "glider", not "motorglider" (I assume you will not be under power). This automatically gives you priority over virtually all other A/C (unless there is another glider, of course). You can then, generously, allow other powered A/C to land as normal (assuming you have sufficient altitude-once I didn't and I ****ed off the controller, but that's another story-BTW, your safety preempts controller's atitudes). This eliminates the A/P access situation. I have also showed up with my glider and requested access to the A/P. Once they realize you have an N number and a radio they become acceptive and helpful. If you hesitate in ANY WAY they will become suspicious. Hey, this is their job. Flying in as a powered GA A/C is Ok, but unnecessary. If you don't know the A/P layout ask for a "progressive taxi". The controllers know this lingo and will bend over backwards to cooperate. Tom Seim DG-400 Richland, WA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Stringfellow wrote:
Scottsdale Arizona (KSDL) is reportedly the busiest single-runway airport in the country, with a considerable number of general aviation and business jet aircraft as well as helicopters. www.airnav.com Scottsdale: 506 operations/day McClellan-Palomar: 761 operations/day and Palomar is about half as long, so simultaneous landings with 3000 ft separation isn't as easy. Mark P.S. And I used to crawl both ways through sleet for 50 miles to get to kindergarten... :P Yeah, I know...I should stop whining... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok... from what I can tell and per suggestions from some very
accomplished and helpful individuals that have been kind enough to allow me to be a bother... my apologies, Next step is as follows: A brief letter to the tower, FAA and airport manager stating my intentions, concern for safety, aircraft limitations (if any), and my expectations I will ask them to inform me in writing of any Federal regulations I may be violating by flying there in a polite, but firm letter. CC my State aviation department, SSA, FAA Washington (AFS 800) as well as Senators and representatives. I have not been able in all of my research to find a single comment that would indicate that this aircraft is in violation of any FAR or any airport that allows light aircraft to fly that will not allow this aircraft type to fly. As well as any Safety or Efficiency issue regarding this aircraft that would impede or delay operations at a single runway airport as well. (assuming reasonablness) So anyway that is plan A. Now in the for what it's worth category... One of the airports that I will be flying out of is Upolu on the northern tip of the Big Island. Just out of curiosity I checked the utilization... 27 operations per month! man... when I start flying there, they may actually reach a level of a (natural positive integer) (Mark James Boyd) wrote in message news:4002d23b$1@darkstar... Michael Stringfellow wrote: Scottsdale Arizona (KSDL) is reportedly the busiest single-runway airport in the country, with a considerable number of general aviation and business jet aircraft as well as helicopters. www.airnav.com Scottsdale: 506 operations/day McClellan-Palomar: 761 operations/day and Palomar is about half as long, so simultaneous landings with 3000 ft separation isn't as easy. Mark P.S. And I used to crawl both ways through sleet for 50 miles to get to kindergarten... :P Yeah, I know...I should stop whining... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|