A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Jet Glider Sparrowhawk



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 21st 04, 03:04 PM
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Water injection works but glowing shock diamonds in an afterburners exhaust
would be cool. Noisy, but cool.

Bill Daniels

"Steve Davis" wrote in message
...
Early models of the KC-135 tanker used water injection
on takeoff for added thrust. No idea how much additional
thrust could be gained by adding this to a 45Lb thrust
turbine but it wouldn't increase fuel consumption the
way an afterburner would. How about a cowling around
the jet and water could be sprayed or misted onto the
exhaust section. Could the steam then mix with the
exhaust well enough to increase thrust or would it
be a perpetual motion add on?

If not, you can add the afterburner! (re-heat)

Bill Daniels





  #2  
Old January 21st 04, 03:36 PM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I've looked into canards, and as a previous
poster pointed out, modern canards sacrafice a bit of
efficiency over trailing tailbooms.

So if this is out, canting engines to the side, or down, seems
a good choice. Doing this with a single engine is awkward.
So perhaps the engine right out the tail?

Hmmm....
  #3  
Old January 22nd 04, 06:09 AM
c1rrus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark James Boyd wrote:

Well, I've looked into canards, and as a previous
poster pointed out, modern canards sacrafice a bit of
efficiency over trailing tailbooms.

So if this is out, canting engines to the side, or down, seems
a good choice. Doing this with a single engine is awkward.
So perhaps the engine right out the tail?

Hmmm....

Look at Max Barel's "Graal" experimental glider in France.
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/max.barel/Graal/overview.html
Seems to work rather well.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sport Pilot - School Won't Offer Gary G Piloting 38 February 16th 05 10:41 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
I wish I'd never got into this... Kevin Neave Soaring 32 September 19th 03 12:18 PM
Restricting Glider Ops at Public Arpt. rjciii Soaring 36 August 25th 03 04:50 PM
Announce/USA: FAA Glider Flying Handbook / Bob Wander SoarBooks Soaring 0 August 11th 03 03:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.