![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"mm" wrote in message ...
Anyone who has an FAA aerobatic altitude waiver. I've seen many loops end significantly lower than 600'. mm Well I don't have a Letter of Authority to perform low altitude aerobatics, but I do have a LOA for another area. The letter is excruciatingly specific about what I am and am not permitted to do. I hope for Turf and Roy's sake that all conditions on said letter were complied with. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry Claussen wrote:
Well I don't have a Letter of Authority to perform low altitude aerobatics, but I do have a LOA for another area. The letter is excruciatingly specific about what I am and am not permitted to do. I hope for Turf and Roy's sake that all conditions on said letter were complied with. Compared to what he has lost already, what the FAA can take is insignificant. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A very poignant piece, but inappropriate to the subject of this
thread. I'd have preferred to read it without the implication that it described, in part or whole, the cause of the accident at Turf. Let's let the FAA do its job of finding causes and suggesting corrections. Meanwhile, we should divorce these tangents from the event by pursuing them as independent threads. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Terry Claussen" wrote in message om... http://www.avweb.com/news/safety/182980-1.html It sound familiar because it is. You have no clue as to what a disservice this does to the folks at Turf. They have flown thousands of aerobatic flights without an accident until this one. It was a midair with a plane going through the middle of the aerobatic box so has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the article you referenced therefore is not "familiar". This accident could have occurred at 5000 feet. Please review the facts prior to posting next time. And for God's sake think about the families and friends involved before putting this on a public forum. Casey Lenox Phoenix |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kilo Charlie" wrote in message news:22HNb.8888$Xq2.5042@fed1read07...
Please review the facts prior to posting next time. And for God's sake think about the families and friends involved before putting this on a public forum. Casey Lenox Phoenix Mr. Lennox, The facts are similar and involve the risks accepted by low altitude aerobatics. I guarantee that risk was not contemplated by the passenger. The creation of an aerobatic box is not some type of shield that will protect your aircraft. Only your eyes and your actions can do that. In my 25 years in aviation, I think daily about families and friends. Friends I have already lost. These accidents should not be swept under the rug, for if they are then we are all the worse for it. We should all resolve to make today safer than yesterday. I have spoken with the author of that piece, it is NOT about Turf, and it was not my intention to imply that it was. The ultimate result of these types of accidents are further restrictions on aviation to the detriment of us all. I hope you will be able to see that, someday. Respectfully, Terry Claussen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The creation of an aerobatic box is not some type of
shield that will protect your aircraft. Only your eyes and your actions can do that. Dear Airmen/Airwomen: There are no guarantees even when we have procedures in effect (aerobatic box). That is the lesson to be learned. My heart goes out to the family and friends of these Airmen, what a tragedy. I came within 5 feet of an American Airlines MD 80 out of Burbank airport, and we were both talking to the same controller (at slightly different times so I did not hear the airline clearance). The controller said "sorry guys my fault," but that would be of little of little condolence to the 92 souls if we had hit. Ultimately we can only depend on ourselves. What if you are on a victor hwy at FL20 and someone busts the Class A airspace in front of you? it is dangerous business even if we just do it for fun and we must always be aware. Craig |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately we all fly invisible aircrafts.
Maybe one day all aircrafts will be required to use technology which exists for many years and can eliminate midairs. Ramy "Shaber CJ" wrote in message ... The creation of an aerobatic box is not some type of shield that will protect your aircraft. Only your eyes and your actions can do that. Dear Airmen/Airwomen: There are no guarantees even when we have procedures in effect (aerobatic box). That is the lesson to be learned. My heart goes out to the family and friends of these Airmen, what a tragedy. I came within 5 feet of an American Airlines MD 80 out of Burbank airport, and we were both talking to the same controller (at slightly different times so I did not hear the airline clearance). The controller said "sorry guys my fault," but that would be of little of little condolence to the 92 souls if we had hit. Ultimately we can only depend on ourselves. What if you are on a victor hwy at FL20 and someone busts the Class A airspace in front of you? it is dangerous business even if we just do it for fun and we must always be aware. Craig |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Questions to ponder:
1)What was the K21 doing at the top of a loop at approx 800 feet agl, and where was it a few seconds before that, and at what speed? 2)What is the official floor of the aerobatic box, NTSB states surface to 6600 msl, this must not be correct: How can the box be in the traffic pattern and still extend to the surface? 3)see FAR 91.303(e) for aerobatic flight AGL limitations. - Mark Navarre ASW-20 OD California, USA - |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2004/01/17 20:34, in article
, "Ramy Yanetz" wrote: Unfortunately we all fly invisible aircrafts. Maybe one day all aircrafts will be required to use technology which exists for many years and can eliminate midairs. Thinking "invisible" is good. Tech is, however, just one more trick in your bag. It cannot eliminate midairs, anymore than ILS has eliminated landing accidents on IMC approaches. Available technology can assist alert pilots in avoiding collisions when used properly, and some of it is affordable. Though I'll install a mode C transponder in my bird and listen up on the appropriate frequencies, no piece of equipment can give me a decisive advantage. Preflight planning that helps me know when and where traffic is most likely to be a threat is necessary. Keeping my eyes outside the cockpit, and my head on a swivel is essential. Flying a glider with a standout paint scheme is helpful. But there will always be days when there are aircraft out there that you never know about. The best you can do is to work smart and hard to make sure that those days are few and far between. Jack |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Plane-crashes because of collision with bees ??? | Dan Simper | Piloting | 18 | February 13th 05 07:37 PM |
Airspeed of military planes | Tetsuji Rai | Piloting | 100 | April 24th 04 02:27 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
"China blamed in '01 air collision" | Mike Yared | Naval Aviation | 8 | September 15th 03 05:07 PM |
"China blamed in '01 air collision" | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 2 | September 14th 03 06:08 PM |