![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect Mike's first point is correct, in the UK at least. Annual checks
for all club members have started at my club, and our Puchacz will probably spend as much time between now and April spinning as in normal flight. UK Puchacz's spent a lot of time in autorotation. I have no doubts when spinning the aircraft because it behaves exactly as it should - plenty of pre-spin warnings (in normal modes of entering a spin), and immediate recovery if you carry out the proper recovery procedures. Sensible procedures (like our rule of no intentional spins below 1500 ft) are a good idea. It's also very good for learning and teaching reasons not to do certain things - once a pilot has discovered that a spin from a failed winch launch occurs without the standard warning signs, it really reinforces the message not to begin maneouvering before flying speed has been regained. My view, based on my own experience and the reactions of student pilots at my club, is that the best approach is to become so familiar with spinning that one's reaction to an unintended spin is not "Oh ****" + panic, but instead, "Oh dear, a spin, now fix it". Last year I was flying my new (well, 1968) Open Cirrus, and decided to check out its spin characteristics. When I performed the recovery procedure, it didn't work! Instead of panic, I remember thinking "Hmm, can't have done that right, do it again" - I discovered I wasn't using full opposite rudder because the rudder loads were substantially higher when spinning. At height was a good time to find this out, rather than low down in an unintentional spin. If I hadn't undergone formal spin recovery refresher training every year since I started flying, I doubt whether I'd have spun the Cirrus intentionally. Of course, I might never spin it unintentionally, but I do now feel rather happier knowing its quirks in the recovery. I'd be far less happy fitting the spin kit to a K21 and spinning that - from what I read this "unspinnable" glider has some interesting recovery characterics. And anyway, it's not unspinnable in standard configuration - our lightest instructor with a light student (still within weight limits) has spun ours! "Mike Borgelt" wrote in message ... On 23 Jan 2004 07:34:04 GMT, Chris Rollings wrote: Spinning in in the Puchacz would seem to be a far higher risk than aerotow upsets due to using a belly release. With 5 in the UK alone maybe someone ought to look into this. A few years ago two test pilots with extensive spin experience including in gliders managed to kill themselves in a Puchacz spin in the US. At the time that was the 13th or 14th case allegedly and there was one more in Austria shortly after that. Either the type is involved in lots of deliberate spinning accidents because a lot of this is done in them or there is something odd about it. In either case there is cause for concern. I've flown the Puchacz but I sure wouldn't even think about spinning one. Mike Borgelt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Cirrus and Lancair Make Bonanza Obsolete? | Potential Bo Buyer | Owning | 211 | November 20th 03 05:29 AM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |