![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmmmm, This is terribly sad to read (and my prayers
will be for their family and friends) but also very pertinent as last Sunday, I took an aerotow to 3000' and did my 'spinning' and some further exercises in spinning. What aircraft did I have all this fun in. . . You guessed it, a Puch. . . . Hmmmm, slightly sick feeling in the stomach. . . It will be interesting to read some more detail of the cause and specific details if they are known. My experience was very positive, the a/c span very quickly under the instructor's control as I had been briefed. I just did what it said on the can and was very pleased to feel the G as I recovered and found the a/c behaving as per the briefing. Having said all this and to end on a postive note, I am hoping to get my first flight in a single seater this weekend, probably tomorrow, hope you vastly experienced guys (& gals) can remember just how excellent I'm sure that must have felt! Any tips??? At 15:06 23 January 2004, Todd Pattist wrote: Al Eddie wrote: The issue is more likely to be of type familiarity and recency in general, not the fact that a particular aircraft type is totally predictable in its behaviour. Upon what facts do you base your conclusion that the aircraft has spinning characteristics that are 'totally predictable?' Questions have been repeatedly raised about the spin behavior of this aircraft. I don't know if it has any problem, and I don't know if it has more accidents than any other type. I do know that it is possible for an aircraft to have unusual flight modes and spin modes that are difficult to enter and may occur only rarely in specific flight attitudes or other seldom encountered conditions. Unfortunately, we don't have perfect knowledge about what happens in all accidents. I don't think you can rule out unpredictable behavior in the spin, nor attribute the accident to a lack of 'type familiarity and recency in general.' Todd Pattist - 'WH' Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) David Pye Kent Gliding Club Charing Mob: 07946-302975 Home: 01732-873088 East Malling, Kent, UK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It will be interesting to read some more detail of the cause and specific
details if they are known. You'll be lucky! Accident reports are rarely released in any detail. Most seem to get a one or two sentence wrap up in the back of the S&G Magazine. The feedback loop to pilots IMVHO is atrocious. Ian Molesworth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are two sources for U.K. accident and incident reports.
Those accidents which are investigated by the government may be found at: Department of Transport, Air Accident Investigation Bureau http://www.aaib.gov.uk/ , Bulletins (from 1996). The reports are also published in a printed monthly pamphlet sent to all UK flying organisations including gliding clubs. The snag with this database is that it is in order of date (by month) of publication of the report, and I have not found a way of searching by accident date. I have made out my own index on a word document, to link by accident date to the report, of the accidents which interest me; most of these are to tugs (all of which are reported), a few are serious glider accidents. The other source is the British Gliding Association for accident and incident reports where the BGA lead the investigation. A very short summary appears in Sailplane & Gliding, and is also included in an annual summary available in print from the BGA. At one time there was a link on the BGA web-site to an on-line copy put up by the Essex club. However I cannot now find that link, and the last time I looked that database had not been updated for several years. According to the terms of reference of the BGA Accident Investigators (available on-line at http://www.gliding.co.uk/forms/subcommitteesterms.pdf see the last of 12 pages), "Subsequent to each investigation a report is to be prepared, to the format of the Air Accidents Investigation Branch ("AAIB") of the Department for Transport ("DfT"), ----- ". I have never seen or heard of any of these reports being published or made available, they are not even given to pilots directly involved in accidents or incidents, or sent to the reporting club. The DfT publish the reports, why not the BGA? I think this is a disgrace. W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). Remove "ic" to reply. "tango4" wrote in message ... It will be interesting to read some more detail of the cause and specific details if they are known. You'll be lucky! Accident reports are rarely released in any detail. Most seem to get a one or two sentence wrap up in the back of the S&G Magazine. The feedback loop to pilots IMVHO is atrocious. Ian Molesworth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Cirrus and Lancair Make Bonanza Obsolete? | Potential Bo Buyer | Owning | 211 | November 20th 03 05:29 AM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |