![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stewart Kissel wrote:
Well it is mid-winter, when Puch-spinning competes with the PW-5 flaming, 2-33 viability, and what-sorta-hat-to-wear as a topic. (NOT INTENDED TO MAKE LIGHT OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THIS TOPIC) After a review of old threads on this topic, I was interested in not finding a pilot's report on difficulty in the spin-recovery characteristics of this ship. Anyone out there in ras-world care to comment on a first-person experience? The club I am a member of requires spin training in the Puchatz prior to flying it solo. To demonstrate that a spin is not an uncontrollable event he had me enter the spin from a nose high attitude, just prior to the stall I kicked in rudder. I was then to hold the glider in the spin for two full revolutions before taking it out. I had to do that in both directions. After that we took another tow and I did 3 or 4 incipient spins in each direction. The spins were totally predictable. I do not recall how long it took to recover from the fully developed spin, but I never had the feeling we were not going to get out of it. In the spin the Puch's nose will go beyond vertical. You can really notice this when flying from the backseat. (The Blanik L-13 will do this also.) I was very happy for the spin training I got. Since then I have gotten into two inadvertent spins. Both times I recognized them for what they were and recovered with a minimal lose of altitude and no panic. BTW, now that I am an instructor I teach spins differently. No one gets in trouble from an intentional stall then kicking the rudder over to induce the spin. I teach it by simulating a low approach on base leg. In this situation the pilot is inadvertently pulling the stick back, trying to keep the plane up, but actually only lowering its speed. Often times folks will then make a shallow turn to final, on the mistaken believe that a shallow turn will loose less altitude. The turn is initiated in the same place they normally would make their turn. When it becomes apparent that the runway will be overshot, still not willing to steeply bank the glider, it is then over rudder to try to make the turn. Since the pilot has been pulling back on the stick he is now slow enough to cause a stall and resultant spin too low to the ground to recover. After explaining on the ground what we are going to do I demonstrate the spin , at quite high altitude. I will allow the glider to do about half a spin revolution. This is enough to get the students attention to the seriousness of this happening at low altitude, but not enough to waste a lot of altitude or severely scare the student. I then have them practice entering and recovering incipient spins in both directions. I do not solo any student or transition pilot until they can explain and demonstrate what causes a spin and how to recover from one. At 15:42 23 January 2004, Owain Walters wrote: Everyone is always an expert arent they? Why do internet lurkers always have an opinion on things they dont know the first fact about? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JC" JRC at visi dot com wrote in message ... In the spin the Puch's nose will go beyond vertical. You can really notice this when flying from the backseat. (The Blanik L-13 will do this also.) (What follows is part of my standard pre-flight briefing to students before teaching spins -the pro's can ignore if they wish.) Various gliders may in fact go past the vertical with respect to the ground but there is more to it. Most of us have the mental picture of a spin entry sequence as if the glider stops all its forward motion at the stall and thereafter proceeds straight down in the spin. With a bit of thought, this is seen as wrong. In fact, the glider carries substantial forward motion through the stall and into the spin. The result of this is that the path of the gliders center of gravity traces an arc that transitions from level flight to vertical in the spin. (Imagine the path of a Badminton birdie.) Usually, the first full turn or two of autorotation is in this arc so that, at the 180 degree points, the glider is somewhat inverted with respect to the ground. To the pilot, this appears as if the spin is asymmetrical as the glider first goes past the vertical and then rotates to a more nose-up attitude. This may well be the source of a lot of the, "Wow, that glider spins funny", or "It tries to go flat in the spin", type of statements. If the pilot holds the glider in the spin, the path will become vertical and, from the perspective of the pilot, will appear to spin symmetrically. With some gliders, I have seen this take two or more turns. If the recovery is attempted at the first 180 degree point, the glider will reach a higher airspeed in the dive recovery and burn more altitude. A better technique is to apply anti-spin controls at a point that will stop the rotation at the 360 degree point. The difference in altitude loss can be substantial. The higher the airspeed at which the stall break occurs, and the faster the glider snaps into the spin, the more pronounced this effect appears. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Cirrus and Lancair Make Bonanza Obsolete? | Potential Bo Buyer | Owning | 211 | November 20th 03 05:29 AM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |