![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Geir Raudsandmoen om wrote: If you were within the permitted CoG range, and used the standard recovery method, the spin behaviour you described is definitely non-compliant with JAR 22 certification rules. JAR22.221 states that a sailplane certificated for intentional spinning must be able to recover from a fully developed spin (5 turns) within 1 turn after recovery action is done. This has to be demonstrated in several loading and control conditions. Fine. Additionally, this paragraph states that it must be impossible to obtain uncontrollable spins with any use of the controls. But how on earth can that be demonstrated? No matter *what* you do, you can't get into an uncontrollable spin? But there are an infinite number of possible things you *might* do with the controls. They can't ALL be tested. -- Bruce |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Puchaz Spinning thread that might be of interest in light of the recent accident. | Al | Soaring | 134 | February 9th 04 03:44 PM |
Spinning (mis)concepts | Arnold Pieper | Soaring | 106 | February 7th 04 01:02 PM |
Spinning Horizon | Mike Adams | Owning | 8 | December 26th 03 01:35 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |