![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beware the
unnecessary use of coarse control, particularly rudder and particularly near the ground! IAN STRACHAN Lasham Gliding Society I did a few calculations of an imaginary glider with a stall speed of 32 knots, a min sink speed of 43 knots, and a wingspan of 87 feet. In a 50 degree bank at 54 knots (good thermalling speed if you believe) www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/soaring/spd2fly/ the fuse and ASI says you are at radius 180 ft circling every 7 seconds. The inner wingtip is 3/4 of that distance, and 3/4 of that airspeed, and should be stalled. The outer wingtip is 5/4 of that distance from center, and 5/4 of that airspeed, and producing excellent lift. Now throw in a down aileron near the wingtip, increasing the AOA of the inner wing. Now have the student not compensating for adverse yaw, and the instructor yelling "get that string centered right now!" Now have the student jam in lots of rudder, and watch the difference in airspeed and AOA during this coarse movement. This is probably why coarse rudder is often used to coarsely demonstrate a spin entry... This is also why I fly a glider with a short wingspan and a weak rudder... (getting a worse L/D design was faster than getting better skill) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark James Boyd wrote:
... I did a few calculations of an imaginary glider with a stall speed of 32 knots, a min sink speed of and a wingspan of 87 feet. In a 50 degree bank at 54 knots (good thermalling speed if you believe) www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/soaring/spd2fly/ the fuse and ASI says you are at radius 180 ft circling every 7 seconds. The inner wingtip is 3/4 of that distance, and 3/4 of that airspeed, and should be stalled. The outer wingtip is 5/4 of that distance from center, and 5/4 of that airspeed, and producing excellent lift. ... I don't completely agree with your computations. I agree with the 54 knots, i.e. 43 knots multiplied by the square root of the load factor at 50 degree bank. However the radius I find for this speed and bank is 66 m (sorry, I prefer to do my calculations in metric, because I know the formulas for metric data), i.e 216.5 ft. A wingspan of 87 feet translate into 26.5 m, the inner wingtip is inside the circle by an amount which is the half wingspan multiplied by the cosine of 50 degree, this is 8.5 m or 27.8 ft. The ratio of the two radii is .87 rather than ..75 and the speed at the inner wing tip is 37.4 kt. Anyway even with your values tis doesn't implies the inner wing tip is stalled, because stall depends on AOA rather than speed. Of course you need an increase of AOA in order to compensate for the lower speed in order to keep an equal lift on both wings. Some difference in AOA between both wings is already provided by the simple fact that the glider is sinking, i.e. both wings have the same vertical component of velocity but different horizontal ones. The complement is provided by aileron deflection, which change not only the AOA but the whole airfoil shape, so that the action is an increased Cl due to both changes in AOA and shape. The stall case would be if the needed Cl would be higher than the maximum achievable Cl, but this can't be decided just from the value of the speed at wing tip. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Ehrlich wrote:
Mark James Boyd wrote: ... I did a few calculations of an imaginary glider with a stall speed of 32 knots, a min sink speed of and a wingspan of 87 feet. In a 50 degree bank at 54 knots (good thermalling speed if you believe) www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/soaring/spd2fly/ the fuse and ASI says you are at radius 180 ft circling every 7 seconds. The inner wingtip is 3/4 of that distance, and 3/4 of that airspeed, and should be stalled. The outer wingtip is 5/4 of that distance from center, and 5/4 of that airspeed, and producing excellent lift. ... I don't completely agree with your computations. I agree with the 54 knots, i.e. 43 knots multiplied by the square root of the load factor at 50 degree bank. However the radius I find for this speed and bank is 66 m (sorry, I prefer to do my calculations in metric, because I know the formulas for metric data), i.e 216.5 ft. A wingspan of 87 feet translate into 26.5 m, the inner wingtip is inside the circle by an amount which is the half wingspan multiplied by the cosine of 50 degree, this is 8.5 m or 27.8 ft. The ratio of the two radii is .87 rather than .75 and the speed at the inner wing tip is 37.4 kt. I forgot to change the wingspan to 90 feet to make the math easy. Sorry. I was really just trying to make the point that the wings have different airspeeds, and this is significant at high bank angles and low speeds with long wings. If this is untrue please let me know. The bigger error of mine that you pointed out was that I did the radius calculations assuming the wings were level. This was incorrect on my part, and resulted in a fairly large discrepancy.... Anyway even with your values tis doesn't implies the inner wing tip is stalled, because stall depends on AOA rather than speed. Of course you need an increase of AOA in order to compensate for the lower speed in order to keep an equal lift on both wings. Some difference in AOA between both wings is already provided by the simple fact that the glider is sinking, i.e. both wings have the same vertical component of velocity but different horizontal ones. The complement is provided by aileron deflection, which change not only the AOA but the whole airfoil shape, so that the action is an increased Cl due to both changes in AOA and shape. The stall case would be if the needed Cl would be higher than the maximum achievable Cl, but this can't be decided just from the value of the speed at wing tip. Exactly why I think AOA indicators halfway+ down the wings would be nice. I've never heard of them on any gliders. Why is this? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 15:59:18 +0000, Robert Ehrlich
wrote: Mark James Boyd wrote: ... I did a few calculations of an imaginary glider with a stall speed of 32 knots, a min sink speed of and a wingspan of 87 feet. In a 50 degree bank at 54 knots (good thermalling speed if you believe) www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/soaring/spd2fly/ the fuse and ASI says you are at radius 180 ft circling every 7 seconds. The inner wingtip is 3/4 of that distance, and 3/4 of that airspeed, and should be stalled. The outer wingtip is 5/4 of that distance from center, and 5/4 of that airspeed, and producing excellent lift. ... I don't completely agree with your computations. I agree with the 54 knots, i.e. 43 knots multiplied by the square root of the load factor at 50 degree bank. However the radius I find for this speed and bank is 66 m (sorry, I prefer to do my calculations in metric, because I know the formulas for metric data), i.e 216.5 ft. A wingspan of 87 feet translate into 26.5 m, the inner wingtip is inside the circle by an amount which is the half wingspan multiplied by the cosine of 50 degree, this is 8.5 m or 27.8 ft. The ratio of the two radii is .87 rather than .75 and the speed at the inner wing tip is 37.4 kt. Anyway even with your values tis doesn't implies the inner wing tip is stalled, because stall depends on AOA rather than speed. Of course you need an increase of AOA in order to compensate for the lower speed in order to keep an equal lift on both wings. Some difference in AOA between both wings is already provided by the simple fact that the glider is sinking, i.e. both wings have the same vertical component of velocity but different horizontal ones. In a descending turn, which is what gliders do in turns, it is not the case that both wings have the same vertical component of velocity. In a stable descending turn the inside wing is always undergoing a downward motion relative to the outer wing. This is one cause for the inside wing to be at a higher AOA than the outer wing, and one reason for the resulting earlier stall than the outer wing. In an ascending turn, power airplanes I guess, it is the outer wing that is always undergoing a downward moovement relative to the inner wing. I found this difficult to visualize at first, but if you try "flying" a stable descending "turn" with your hand you will experience it clearly. The complement is provided by aileron deflection, which change not only the AOA but the whole airfoil shape, so that the action is an increased Cl due to both changes in AOA and shape. The stall case would be if the needed Cl would be higher than the maximum achievable Cl, but this can't be decided just from the value of the speed at wing tip. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ....in a stable descending turn the inside wing is always undergoing a downward motion relative to the outer wing. This is one cause for the inside wing to be at a higher AOA than the outer wing, and one reason for the resulting earlier stall than the outer wing. Understood! What I don't unerstand is how much washout plays into this equation. I would suspect that it would reduce this efffect but how much? Tony V. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 14:41:20 -0500, Tony Verhulst
wrote: ....in a stable descending turn the inside wing is always undergoing a downward motion relative to the outer wing. This is one cause for the inside wing to be at a higher AOA than the outer wing, and one reason for the resulting earlier stall than the outer wing. Understood! What I don't unerstand is how much washout plays into this equation. I would suspect that it would reduce this efffect but how much? Tony V. Really good question! I don't know. Since washout is, in a sense, a relative term -- that is washout produces a lower AOA at the wing tips compared to the AOA at the wing roots -- my guess is that in all cases where AOA is critical the wing tip washout delays the effects we might expect from what we see of the nose attitude of the aircraft. But then, this is really not saying anything new! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ....in a stable descending turn the inside wing is always undergoing a downward motion relative to the outer wing. This is one cause for the inside wing to be at a higher AOA than the outer wing, and one reason for the resulting earlier stall than the outer wing. Understood! What I don't unerstand is how much washout plays into this equation. I would suspect that it would reduce this efffect but how much? Really good question! I don't know. Since washout is, in a sense, a relative term -- that is washout produces a lower AOA at the wing tips compared to the AOA at the wing roots After thinking about this for a while, I suspect that it (washout) doesn't matter. After all, both wings tips have an equal amount of washout and so the net effect cancels out. The lower wing tip will still have a higher angle of attack than the upper and will still stall first. In this case, the effect of washout is a (wait for it :-) ) wash. Tony V. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 11:14:33 -0500, Tony Verhulst
wrote: ....in a stable descending turn the inside wing is always undergoing a downward motion relative to the outer wing. This is one cause for the inside wing to be at a higher AOA than the outer wing, and one reason for the resulting earlier stall than the outer wing. Understood! What I don't unerstand is how much washout plays into this equation. I would suspect that it would reduce this efffect but how much? Really good question! I don't know. Since washout is, in a sense, a relative term -- that is washout produces a lower AOA at the wing tips compared to the AOA at the wing roots After thinking about this for a while, I suspect that it (washout) doesn't matter. After all, both wings tips have an equal amount of washout and so the net effect cancels out. The lower wing tip will still have a higher angle of attack than the upper and will still stall first. In this case, the effect of washout is a (wait for it :-) ) wash. Tony V. Makes sense to me! Thanks. Jim |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
... In a descending turn, which is what gliders do in turns, it is not the case that both wings have the same vertical component of velocity. In a stable descending turn the inside wing is always undergoing a downward motion relative to the outer wing. This is one cause for the inside wing to be at a higher AOA than the outer wing, and one reason for the resulting earlier stall than the outer wing. In an ascending turn, power airplanes I guess, it is the outer wing that is always undergoing a downward moovement relative to the inner wing. I found this difficult to visualize at first, but if you try "flying" a stable descending "turn" with your hand you will experience it clearly. Can't understand that. If both wingtips have a different vertical component of velocity, the vertical distance between them should change, increasing the bank angle if the inner wing sinks faster than the outer one. This difference must anyway stop at 90 degrees bank. But as long as the bank angle remains constant, both wings should have the same vertical component of velocity. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Ehrlich wrote:
Jim wrote: ... In a descending turn, which is what gliders do in turns, it is not the case that both wings have the same vertical component of velocity. In a stable descending turn the inside wing is always undergoing a downward motion relative to the outer wing. This is one cause for the inside wing to be at a higher AOA than the outer wing, and one reason for the resulting earlier stall than the outer wing. In an ascending turn, power airplanes I guess, it is the outer wing that is always undergoing a downward moovement relative to the inner wing. I found this difficult to visualize at first, but if you try "flying" a stable descending "turn" with your hand you will experience it clearly. Can't understand that. If both wingtips have a different vertical component of velocity, the vertical distance between them should change, increasing the bank angle if the inner wing sinks faster than the outer one. This difference must anyway stop at 90 degrees bank. But as long as the bank angle remains constant, both wings should have the same vertical component of velocity. Relative to what? - is the point. You are correct that their vertical component of velocity must be the same because of geometry, if the bank angle remains constant. However, because the inner wing is describing a smaller diameter spiral the relative wind will present at a higher angle of attack on the inner wing tip - relative to the outer wingtip. Velocity relative to the ground is not entirely sufficient to understand what is happening in three dimensions. In the same time the inner tip travels a smaller distance, but descends the same vertical distance, hence the greater angle of descent, not rate. People seem to continuously confuse rates and angles? Airflow behavior is very dependent on angles and chord wise component of airflow velocity... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inspiration by friends - mutal interest and motivation to get the PPL | Gary G | Piloting | 1 | October 29th 04 09:19 PM |
Baby Bush will be Closing Airports in California to VFR Flight Again | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 119 | March 13th 04 02:56 AM |
Some Fiction For Interest | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 8 | March 6th 04 03:45 AM |
Spinning Horizon | Mike Adams | Owning | 8 | December 26th 03 01:35 AM |