![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I once watched a pilot turn an ASW 20 through 360 degrees after a 75
foot rope break. With each successive 90 degree turn, I heaved a sigh of relief, until he rolled into the next one. The pilot made three 90 degree left hand turns, at one point dropping slightly below the level of the runway, until he was lined up to land across the runway. He made his last 90 degree right turn in ground effect, using rudder only. I didn't see much of the touchdown or rollout, as I was running for life and limb. The glider was undamaged. The pilot, on the other hand... To my knowledge, he never flew another glider. "Bill Daniels" wrote in message ... "CV" wrote in message ... Fredrik Thörnell wrote: What does the commentator say about 18 meter (high?) something? Or is He is saying that the cable broke at 80 meters height. (200 odd feet) CV Perhaps someone familiar with the incident could explain why the pilot tried to turn back from a height of 80 meters. I would expect that, with a wire break at 80 meters, the pilot would have 75% or more of the airfield straight ahead for a safe landing. In fact, a 180 degree turn from an 80 meter wire break would leave no place to land at most winch sites. Bill Daniels |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He made his last 90 degree right turn in ground effect, using rudder
only. I didn't see much of the touchdown or rollout, as I was running for life and limb. The glider was undamaged. The pilot, on the other hand... To my knowledge, he never flew another glider. A turn at low speed with rudder only is an invitation for a spin. At low altitude, it will usually end exactly the way we saw in this video, with the glider spinning right into the ground. If your collegue performed that last turn at very high speed the glider wouldn't turn with rudder only. If it was at low speed, and below 2 feet altitude, one of the wingtips certainly touched first and it wasn't very pretty. If he was above 2 feet, the result would have been some glider damage. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arnold Pieper wrote:
He made his last 90 degree right turn in ground effect, using rudder only. I didn't see much of the touchdown or rollout, as I was running for life and limb. The glider was undamaged. The pilot, on the other hand... To my knowledge, he never flew another glider. A turn at low speed with rudder only is an invitation for a spin. At low altitude, it will usually end exactly the way we saw in this video, with the glider spinning right into the ground. I wonder if this was use of rudder, or coarse use of rudder. I suspect the steep bank and different wing airspeeds set it up, and then an accelerated use of rudder caused the wingtip speeds to be that much more (a skidding stab at the rudder seems like it would have a different effect than slowly putting in rudder). If your collegue performed that last turn at very high speed the glider wouldn't turn with rudder only. If it was at low speed, and below 2 feet altitude, one of the wingtips certainly touched first and it wasn't very pretty. I've done quite a few turns with level wings and using rudder to turn below 2 feet. I've done it both on the takeoff roll (to line up from being way off) behind the towplane, and after landing to line up with the takeoff runway (about 120 degrees left). In the first case I probably should have simply released immediately. In the second case I should have stopped straight ahead. Not because this was necessary (it wasn't, since de facto everything worked out fine) but because it would be better practice for flying a higher performance glider, where both of these circumstances could possibly create a ground loop. The competition pilots stay REAL straight at low airspeeds. I suspect a few ground loops have convinced them not to put in adverse yaw (and rudder to turn) during taxi. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark James Boyd" wrote in message news:4023fa90$1@darkstar... Arnold Pieper wrote: I've done quite a few turns with level wings and using rudder to turn below 2 feet. I've done it both on the takeoff roll (to line up from being way off) behind the towplane, and after landing to line up with the takeoff runway (about 120 degrees left). In the first case I probably should have simply released immediately. In the second case I should have stopped straight ahead. Not because this was necessary (it wasn't, since de facto everything worked out fine) but because it would be better practice for flying a higher performance glider, where both of these circumstances could possibly create a ground loop. The competition pilots stay REAL straight at low airspeeds. I suspect a few ground loops have convinced them not to put in adverse yaw (and rudder to turn) during taxi. Sometimes you have no choice. I had a tow pilot suddenly brake to a halt just as I lifted off. My choice was to try a flat turn and risk a ground loop or hit the tug. My wheel brake was useless for the task of stopping short of the tug and anyway, my wheel wasn't on the runway. Fortunately, I succeeded in turning the Lark 45 degrees before touchdown using rudder only - and avoiding a groundloop. (Then I had an eyeball to eyeball talk with the tug pilot.) Bill Daniels |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
Sometimes you have no choice. I had a tow pilot suddenly brake to a halt just as I lifted off. My choice was to try a flat turn and risk a ground loop or hit the tug. My wheel brake was useless for the task of stopping short of the tug and anyway, my wheel wasn't on the runway. Fortunately, I succeeded in turning the Lark 45 degrees before touchdown using rudder only - and avoiding a groundloop. (Then I had an eyeball to eyeball talk with the tug pilot.) Bill Daniels A real good reason to use a little longer rope, eh? I'm glad you weren't hurt, and I hope you got a good reason and a beer from the tuggie. I must say though, when I was taught to aerotow, and to drive a tug, both instructors said "you don't owe a damn thing to the other guy. If you have a problem, you release immediately and save your own arse." Don't get me wrong, release and potential release at rotation is one of my greatest fears (it's happened to me a few times, never initiated by me on purpose). But it is so scary I didn't even practice a tuggie abort while actually hooked up during any of my training... Even if I rehearsed this one on the ground first, I'd still be pretty apprehensive of practicing this abnormal procedure... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In fact, he did exactly what you said can't be done. He had some help
from the main gear, which touched the runway several times assiting his skidding turn. If memory serves, he wound up pretty much where he started, pointing in the opposite direction. There were many, many witnesses. What parts I didn't see while running, I had recounted to me in excrutiating detail, mainly because it was my glider. (The pilot of the 20F, by the way, nearly hit my other glider, a parked Pegase. The only two French gliders on the airport. Proof again that like seeks like.) Better, I think, to start with observed facts rather than to try to deduce them. As for owning two French gliders, you are welcome to exercise your powers of induction. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Spin Training | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 25 | April 12th 04 02:11 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |