![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 21:24 06 February 2004, Chuck wrote:
I don't know how the reg's work with gliders. Does he need to have an STC to do this? In general: The majority of gliders operate under the same FARs as small airplanes. The way I understand it, an STC and/or 337 paperwork is only required if the glider holds type certification and a standard airworthiness certificate, and then only if it is determined that the addition constitutes a major modification. If the glider holds Experimental certification (either Racing, Exhibition, or Amateur-Built) and a Special Airworthiness Certificate, probably all that is required is a logbook entry by the installer. For Experimentals, the operating limitations that accompany the airworthiness certificate will probably have specific instructions about modifications. Thanks, and best regards to all Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Kuykendall" In general: The majority of gliders operate under the same FARs as small airplanes. The way I understand it, an STC and/or 337 paperwork is only required if the glider holds type certification and a standard airworthiness certificate, and then only if it is determined that the addition constitutes a major modification. If the glider holds Experimental certification (either Racing, Exhibition, or Amateur-Built) and a Special Airworthiness Certificate, probably all that is required is a logbook entry by the installer. For Experimentals, the operating limitations that accompany the airworthiness certificate will probably have specific instructions about modifications. Thanks, and best regards to all Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com DING!!!! We have a winner. An STC is not required. An STC is a device that allows for repeated installations of a pre-engineered assembly on multiple aircraft. There is linkage with an STC and a PMA holder for the manufacture of the components. A form 337 will be required and an associated field approval noted in the logbook. This is because the scope of the work will exceed AC43's descriptions of repairs. Since it isn't outlined in AC43, the feds make the assumption that it will be a major modification. The logic being that it isn't defined as a Major Repair or Alteration or allowable as a minor repair. That leaves a 337 as the regulators way out. The good news is that you can do it on the cheap with skate wheels that work really well and the paperwork isn't that involved. I also think you might need to brush up on the regs if you hang your shingle out and work in the real world. All the doc's are online and the AD notes are on CD and the omnthly updates are reasonable (and mandatory if your an IA). Bob is correct about logbook entrys being needed for Experimental AC but in actual practice this seldom occurs as the config of the a/p usually isn't clearly defined when the CofA is issued...... Food for thought Scott.. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lyc. O-360 cylinder question | JB | Owning | 13 | November 27th 04 09:32 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
Special Flight Setup Question (COF) | Dudley Henriques | Simulators | 4 | October 11th 03 12:14 AM |