A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ultra Light Towing



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 7th 04, 05:34 AM
Andreas Maurer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:57:58 +0100, Stefan
wrote:


I've flown a Janus behind a G3-Mirage. It takes definitely longer to get
off the ground, but once airborne, the climb rate is nearly that of an
"ordinary" plane. The whole tow takes a bit longer, but due to the much
lower cost of the UL, it's still much cheaper.

I'd say it works fine from a paved runway or from a long grass runway.
Not recommended from short runways or with a tailwind, especially if the
rope break options are difficult or if there are obstacles at the end of
the runway.


I heard from a reliable source that aerotow tests with a single-seater
(iirc Ventus) behind an Impule 100 with a 100 hp Rotax 912S showed a
climb rate of more than 1.000 fpm... (!). This might be the first
ultralight that is a full replacement for a Remorqeur, even on
less-than-perfect conditions.

It helps significantly if the tow plane is aerodynamically clean.
The G3 Mirage and Mattin Wezel's Condor are NOT clean.



Bye
Andreas
  #2  
Old February 7th 04, 09:34 AM
Bruce Greeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andreas Maurer wrote:

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:57:58 +0100, Stefan
wrote:



I've flown a Janus behind a G3-Mirage. It takes definitely longer to get
off the ground, but once airborne, the climb rate is nearly that of an
"ordinary" plane. The whole tow takes a bit longer, but due to the much
lower cost of the UL, it's still much cheaper.

I'd say it works fine from a paved runway or from a long grass runway.
Not recommended from short runways or with a tailwind, especially if the
rope break options are difficult or if there are obstacles at the end of
the runway.



I heard from a reliable source that aerotow tests with a single-seater
(iirc Ventus) behind an Impule 100 with a 100 hp Rotax 912S showed a
climb rate of more than 1.000 fpm... (!). This might be the first
ultralight that is a full replacement for a Remorqeur, even on
less-than-perfect conditions.

It helps significantly if the tow plane is aerodynamically clean.
The G3 Mirage and Mattin Wezel's Condor are NOT clean.



Bye
Andreas

Where could we get more information on said Impule ultralight?

Bruce
  #3  
Old February 7th 04, 03:13 PM
Andreas Maurer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 11:34:31 +0200, Bruce Greeff
wrote:

Where could we get more information on said Impule ultralight?


www.impulse-aircraft.de

Bye
Andreas
  #4  
Old February 7th 04, 03:17 PM
Wayne Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bruce Greeff" wrote in message
...

Where could we get more information on said Impule ultralight?

Bruce


A Google search for "Impule ultralight" yielded nothing: however, "Impulse
ultralight" provided several links including the following:
http://www.impulse-aircraft.de/english/home/firma.html

Wayne
http://www.soaridaho.com/


  #5  
Old February 9th 04, 05:41 AM
Bruce Greeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wayne Paul wrote:
"Bruce Greeff" wrote in message
...


Where could we get more information on said Impule ultralight?

Bruce



A Google search for "Impule ultralight" yielded nothing: however, "Impulse
ultralight" provided several links including the following:
http://www.impulse-aircraft.de/english/home/firma.html

Wayne
http://www.soaridaho.com/


Thanks - I got the same and was wondering if it was a typo, or not.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Skycraft Landing Light Question Jay Honeck Owning 15 February 3rd 05 06:49 PM
C-172 landing light switch JFLEISC Piloting 16 May 6th 04 01:15 AM
C-172 landing light switch JFLEISC Owning 10 May 5th 04 11:05 PM
The light bulb Greasy Rider Military Aviation 6 March 2nd 04 12:07 PM
OT but very funny after some of the posts we have had of late. Mycroft Military Aviation 1 August 8th 03 10:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.