![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MikeYankee wrote:
involved progressively reducing airbrakes as one approached the ground... Sounds kinda flaky to me. I guess the key thing is what "progressively" means, and at what point during the approach the reduction in spoilers is started. Spoilers SHOULD be reduced in the last few seconds of the approach, as touching down in the proper landing attitude without spoilers gives the lowest touchdown speed -- especially important for unflapped ships and off- or rough-field landings. I think SHOULD is too strong a statement. Many gliders become very sensitive to pitch control with spoilers closed, and any value from a reduction in touchdown speed is likely to be negated by ballooning and subsequent hard touchdown. This is especially true of all the flapped gliders I've flown when landing with positive flap (the usual case); it's probably easier to do on an unflapped glider. If you can do it under the stress and uncertain conditions of field landing, I'm impressed, because I know I'm very unlikely to do so, based on thousands of landings on airports and dozens in fields. Another situation where it would be a poor choice is a short field where the need to stop as quickly as possible is important. Floating along is not a good idea when a fence is approaching! -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think SHOULD is too strong a statement.
I don't think it's too strong, but perhaps too general. It depends somewhat on conditions. If it's gusty, keeping some spoiler on is wise because quickly cleaning up the wing as you lower the nose may be the best way to fly out of a wind shear; if your spoilers are already retracted and you're still 20 ft high a few knots above stall speed you may arrive precipitously. On the other hand, if you're coming in over an obstacle into a short field, a firm impact with spoilers is preferable to floating into the trees at the other end. On the third hand, if you're landing in a long field whose surface is unknown and possibly rough, you're better off making the glider alight at the lowest possible speed, which means no spoilers. I contend that in calm conditions, you should touch down (flapless gliders) with a clean wing and a slightly tail-low attitude. When I see people float and overshoot it's often because they have too much speed and too much spoiler on short final and roundout. Abruptly closing the spoilers in this situation is just like adding power in an airplane. Mike Yankee (Address is munged to thwart spammers. To reply, delete everything after "com".) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tamed by the Tailwheel | [email protected] | Piloting | 84 | January 18th 05 04:08 PM |
VW-1 C-121J landing with unlocked nose wheel | Mel Davidow LT USNR Ret | Military Aviation | 1 | January 19th 04 05:22 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 04:35 PM |
Power-out spot landing techniques? | Richard Thomas | Piloting | 50 | August 20th 03 01:27 AM |