A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Puchaz spin count 23 and counting



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th 04, 02:33 AM
Judy Ruprecht
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

At 18:00 08 February 2004, Mark James Boyd wrote:
I've seen a lot of chutes (many legally expired) in
single seat
gliders as well. The FAA seems to leave these guys
alone,
recognising that since no chute at all is required,
having an expired one in a single seater is not exactly
front page news...


Geez, I don't know any FAA types ignoring 61.307(a)...
whenever a parachute is carried in any aircraft and
made 'available for emergency use,' it must be in current
pack.

Judy


  #2  
Old February 10th 04, 07:31 AM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Judy Ruprecht wrote:
At 18:00 08 February 2004, Mark James Boyd wrote:
I've seen a lot of chutes (many legally expired) in
single seat
gliders as well. The FAA seems to leave these guys
alone,
recognising that since no chute at all is required,
having an expired one in a single seater is not exactly
front page news...


Geez, I don't know any FAA types ignoring 61.307(a)...
whenever a parachute is carried in any aircraft and
made 'available for emergency use,' it must be in current
pack.


Er...I wasn't suggesting they are ignoring 61.307(a),
just that their investigation of:

recurring complaints
suspected violations of FARs
and special emphasis areas

keeps them pretty busy with more obvious dangers,

and since it is rare that an inspector
will observe it unsafe, be notified by ATC of
it being unsafe, or find it in a routine inspection
are low (given the part 91 Ramp Inspection Checklist
doesn't even note this item)

Chapter 56, Conduct a FAR Part 91 Ramp Inspection

www1.faa.gov/avr/afs/faa/8700/8700_vol2/2_056_00.pdf

I'd say the chances of being violated for this in
a single seat experimental glider are about equivalent
to violations for missing static wicks or
flammable data plates.

Since solo parachutes aren't generally required,
for safety, I personally don't think parachutes worn in
single seat aircraft should have any expiration, and
I think the pilot should be able to pack it him/her self,
if he/she wants.

Passengers, on the other hand, don't have any idea
what's going on, and regs for them seem like a good idea...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inside A U.S. Election Vote Counting Program Peter Twydell Military Aviation 0 July 10th 03 08:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.