A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Super Dimona Motorglider in Soaring magazine feb 2004



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 10th 04, 08:02 PM
Rod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why is the Rotax despised in the U.S.?

Regards,
Rod


  #2  
Old February 11th 04, 03:55 AM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Rod wrote:
Why is the Rotax despised in the U.S.?

Regards,
Rod


Ooops...politically correct...

Ummm..."some mechanics in the US are less familiar with
Rotax than the more commonly found Continental and Lycoming
engines popular in many US aircraft"

Or the translation (some mechanic terms may be mungled for
less clarit):

"What are you thinking bringing me this f****r to work on?
I don' have any G*****n parts for it and it'll take six
years and postage from Alaska just to get the m***********g
manual. You couldn't just put in a gool Ol' Cub engine?
This piece of s**t is designed by some b*********g
Swiss watchmaker..."

Often followed by the U.S. mechanic inquiring gently about
your geneology and how your sexual preference may inhibit
your prospects for children and there's probably a
mechanic in Massachusets that could better help you...
  #3  
Old February 11th 04, 06:57 AM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark James Boyd wrote:
In article , Rod wrote:

Why is the Rotax despised in the U.S.?

Regards,
Rod



Ooops...politically correct...

Ummm..."some mechanics in the US are less familiar with
Rotax than the more commonly found Continental and Lycoming
engines popular in many US aircraft"

Or the translation (some mechanic terms may be mungled for
less clarit):

"What are you thinking bringing me this f****r to work on?
I don' have any G*****n parts for it and it'll take six
years and postage from Alaska just to get the m***********g
manual. You couldn't just put in a gool Ol' Cub engine?
This piece of s**t is designed by some b*********g
Swiss watchmaker..."


"Despised by mechanics" is quite different from "despised in the US".
Rotaxes are used on gliders like the Stemme and Ximango, and by zillions
of ultralights and amateur built airplanes. Are you sure parts are hard
to get? I've seen thick catalogs for Rotax parts in the US, and a
thousands of hits for "rotax engine parts" on the web, plus repair
station listings.

--
-----
change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

  #4  
Old February 11th 04, 03:31 PM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Mark James Boyd wrote:
In article , Rod wrote:

Why is the Rotax despised in the U.S.?

Regards,
Rod



Ooops...politically correct...

Ummm..."some mechanics in the US are less familiar with
Rotax than the more commonly found Continental and Lycoming
engines popular in many US aircraft"

Or the translation (some mechanic terms may be mungled for
less clarit):

"What are you thinking bringing me this f****r to work on?
I don' have any G*****n parts for it and it'll take six
years and postage from Alaska just to get the m***********g
manual. You couldn't just put in a gool Ol' Cub engine?
This piece of s**t is designed by some b*********g
Swiss watchmaker..."


"Despised by mechanics" is quite different from "despised in the US".
Rotaxes are used on gliders like the Stemme and Ximango, and by zillions
of ultralights and amateur built airplanes. Are you sure parts are hard
to get? I've seen thick catalogs for Rotax parts in the US, and a
thousands of hits for "rotax engine parts" on the web, plus repair
station listings.

--
-----
change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA


I once again retract my previous post. Nobody anywhere despises
Rotax engines. This was simply wrong and golly, I'm sorry.

So just cut and paste in:

"Some mechanics in the US are less familiar with
Rotax than the more commonly found Continental and Lycoming
engines popular in many US aircraft"


....and I never said parts were hard to find. I'm sure there
are lots of DISassembled Rotax engines all over the U.S...
grin

  #5  
Old February 11th 04, 05:01 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

perhaps because previous to the Dimona Motorglider.. they were previously
used on non-certificated aircraft like ultra lights or some small
experimental..

and as a previous poster noted.. most US A&Ps are not used to working on
them

BT

"Rod" wrote in message
...
Why is the Rotax despised in the U.S.?

Regards,
Rod




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
January/February 2004 issue of Southern California Soaring is on-line [email protected] Soaring 8 January 4th 04 09:37 PM
Soaring magazine JJ Sinclair Soaring 24 November 14th 03 03:24 PM
SSA Soaring Magazine Mel Eastburn Soaring 0 September 29th 03 12:03 PM
Aug. Soaring Magazine (USA) Nolaminar Soaring 6 August 2nd 03 01:54 AM
"Soaring" magazine on CD-ROM like EAA Burt Compton Soaring 5 July 12th 03 10:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.