![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark James Boyd wrote:
Soaring ought to be about flying the aircraft, not just monitoring the government-mandated distractions. The thing would either be activated during most thermaling, or have such a close tolerance as to give no useful warning to those who would most need it -- and they are expensive. Would you recommend flashing lights on the panel, a speaker tone to compete with the vario, or both? Perhaps you would also like to incorporate a stick-shaker? Who said anything about the gubmint? And what would I want with a vario during the landing phase, off-field or not? If I've got the gear down and the spoilers out, I'd be playing the fool to try using the vario for anything... Have the vario shut itself off and let the stall warning buzzer on... Expensive? I couldn't comment on that...And are the fatal accidents so rare as to make this idea pointless? Perhaps... As far as spoilers and flaps changing the stall speed, I suppose that's glider dependent on how much. And as far as bugs, again I don't know how far off the normal stall speed you'd see... Maybe it's negligible, maybe not. Dunno... Some varios, like the Cambridge 302, already have gear warning, spoiler unlocked on takeoff warning, and airspeed alert built into them. It even adjusts for G loading. I suspect it would be a simple change to it's software to have two airspeed alerts, based on gear position: Gear up (soaring): set it a little below normal thermalling speed (about 46 knot setting works on my glider with my 302). Gear down (landing): set it a little below the typical pattern speed (about 50 knots would work on my glider). -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gear up (soaring): set it a little below normal thermalling speed (about
46 knot setting works on my glider with my 302). Gear down (landing): set it a little below the typical pattern speed (about 50 knots would work on my glider). Some may think this a cheap shot, but what the heck. Believe it or not some pilots fly gliders with fixed gear. They even fly them X-C and make land outs. They even stall/spin them. Too many people in this sport think you need ALL the bells and whistles and a $100,000+ glider to be a "real" glider pilot. That attitude is hurting us. Robert Mudd |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robertmudd1u wrote:
Gear up (soaring): set it a little below normal thermalling speed (about 46 knot setting works on my glider with my 302). Gear down (landing): set it a little below the typical pattern speed (about 50 knots would work on my glider). Some may think this a cheap shot, but what the heck. Believe it or not some pilots fly gliders with fixed gear. They even fly them X-C and make land outs. They even stall/spin them. I was trying to keep the discussion simple and focused on the air speed alert idea. It'd also failin a retractable gear glider if the pilot forgot to put the gear down. Fixed gear gliders could use a switch for "landing mode". Perhaps one switched on by opening the spoilers during the pattern checks that stays switched on even when the spoilers are closed after the checks would be better. The pilot would manually reset it after landing, or after using the spoilers while soaring. Too many people in this sport think you need ALL the bells and whistles and a $100,000+ glider to be a "real" glider pilot. That attitude is hurting us. Agreed, but the discussion isn't about being a "real" glider pilot, but how to help the pilot when his piloting fails. People spinning in are definitely hurting us. If the airspeed alert idea is useful, it can be cheaply implemented by pilots using the Cambridge 302 and similar high end varios. That's got to be good. Extending the protection (if it is protection) to pilots that won't buy an expensive vario, or the $1100 DSI from DG, would be the next challenge. If proven to be of value (and having people using the idea via 302/DSI route would be one way), I think you'd see it popping up in cheaper systems. A special unit that did only the airspeed alert for landing would be a lot cheaper than the DSI. The DSI itself might get a lot cheaper if these kinds of things began selling, and competitors appeared. -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robertmudd1u wrote:
Some may think this a cheap shot, but what the heck. Believe it or not some pilots fly gliders with fixed gear. They even fly them X-C and make land outs. They even stall/spin them. Too many people in this sport think you need ALL the bells and whistles and a $100,000+ glider to be a "real" glider pilot. That attitude is hurting us. Robert Mudd I certainly would not use the word "need" with respect to a glider AOA indicator. And yes, cheap and simple is important. Perhaps the cheapest idea is simply the ol' harmonica style Cezzna AOA indicators, one mounted on each wingtip of a 1-26 (easier to install on a metal wing, and the 1-26 is a glider with more than it's share of stalls leading to fatalities). Then, if added complexity is warranted, a small switch on the spoilers which deactivates the audio vario when the spoilers are out, so one can now just barely hear the stall horns. Ideally, it would be nice to have removable wingtips, so one could experiment without modifying a whole wing... Perhaps there are other types that would have this feature to allow inexpensive experimentation. Then maybe try the electric AOA tabs too... -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark James Boyd" wrote in message news:4054b43e$1@darkstar... Robertmudd1u wrote: Some may think this a cheap shot, but what the heck. Believe it or not some pilots fly gliders with fixed gear. They even fly them X-C and make land outs. They even stall/spin them. Too many people in this sport think you need ALL the bells and whistles and a $100,000+ glider to be a "real" glider pilot. That attitude is hurting us. Robert Mudd I certainly would not use the word "need" with respect to a glider AOA indicator. And yes, cheap and simple is important. Perhaps the cheapest idea is simply the ol' harmonica style Cezzna AOA indicators, one mounted on each wingtip of a 1-26 (easier to install on a metal wing, and the 1-26 is a glider with more than it's share of stalls leading to fatalities). Then, if added complexity is warranted, a small switch on the spoilers which deactivates the audio vario when the spoilers are out, so one can now just barely hear the stall horns. Ideally, it would be nice to have removable wingtips, so one could experiment without modifying a whole wing... Perhaps there are other types that would have this feature to allow inexpensive experimentation. Then maybe try the electric AOA tabs too... -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA Tape two yaw strings (which then become pitch strings) on each side of the canopy at the lowest and most forward part you can still see. Fly once with a grease pencil to mark the inside of the canopy at the string positions for best L/D, minimum sink, and stall. By using a string on each side of the canopy, the error introduced by inadvertent yaw is obvious and can be eliminated with rudder. The string position for best L/D, min sink, and stall will always be the same whether the glider is ballasted, empty or in a steep turn - although the airspeeds will be very different. The string angle difference between minimum sink and stall is large so the bright red, wiggling strings angled up steeply are a good visual stall warning. Bill Daniels |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Daniels" wrote:
Tape two yaw strings (which then become pitch strings) on each side of the canopy at the lowest and most forward part you can still see. The string angle difference between minimum sink and stall is large so the bright red, wiggling strings angled up steeply are a good visual stall warning. That must be true only for unflapped gliders, or it's valid only for one specific flap setting in a flapped glider. Or you have to make different coloured markings for each and every flap setting. Aldo Cernezzi |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "cernauta" wrote in message ... "Bill Daniels" wrote: Tape two yaw strings (which then become pitch strings) on each side of the canopy at the lowest and most forward part you can still see. The string angle difference between minimum sink and stall is large so the bright red, wiggling strings angled up steeply are a good visual stall warning. That must be true only for unflapped gliders, or it's valid only for one specific flap setting in a flapped glider. Or you have to make different coloured markings for each and every flap setting. Aldo Cernezzi You're right about flaps making a difference in the calibration. I've only tried this on two flapped gliders and one without flaps. However, It seemed to work pretty well in all cases. I actually didn't see too much difference in the string indications at different flap settings. The flap issue is partly moot since the flap settings are related to airspeed bands. Stall concerns would likely arise only with the flaps in their most positive two settings, landing or slow thermalling. The near-stall indication is very obvious. Bill Daniels |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill,
Are you still using the AOA indicators made from yaw strings? Which glider type is it mounted on? I assume these strings would be forward, so you visualize them at the same time you see the normal yaw string. Is that correct? John |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
"cernauta" wrote in message ... "Bill Daniels" wrote: Tape two yaw strings (which then become pitch strings) on each side of the canopy at the lowest and most forward part you can still see. The string angle difference between minimum sink and stall is large so the bright red, wiggling strings angled up steeply are a good visual stall warning. That must be true only for unflapped gliders, or it's valid only for one specific flap setting in a flapped glider. Or you have to make different coloured markings for each and every flap setting. Aldo Cernezzi You're right about flaps making a difference in the calibration. I've only tried this on two flapped gliders and one without flaps. However, It seemed to work pretty well in all cases. I actually didn't see too much difference in the string indications at different flap settings. The flap issue is partly moot since the flap settings are related to airspeed bands. Stall concerns would likely arise only with the flaps in their most positive two settings, landing or slow thermalling. The near-stall indication is very obvious. Have you tried these in a shallow turning stall, when it is the wing tip that stalls, not the root? -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Rotorcraft | 0 | April 29th 04 08:29 PM |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 29th 04 08:09 PM |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | General Aviation | 0 | April 29th 04 08:09 PM |
Spin on thermal entry - how-to | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 0 | January 29th 04 05:43 PM |
Thermal to Wave contact! | C.Fleming | Soaring | 1 | January 21st 04 01:54 PM |