![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SAILPLANE STALL WARNING SYSTEMS - Recent History
Because of concern about sailplane stall accidents, during early 1987 OSTIV announced that they would sponsor a "Competition for Development of a Special Flight Instrument for Stall Warning of Sailplanes". We of the Dallas Gliding Association decided that entering that competition was certainly a worthwhile project. The offered prize for 1st place was 2,550 DM, and 1,000 DM for 2nd place. Those prizes were awarded after flight-testing judging and during the 1989 OSTIV Congress at Weiner Neustadt in Austria. Over a 2-year period we studied various candidate configurations, and performed developmental flight-testing with 5 or 6 different experimental stall warning systems. While most of the flight-testing was performed with my Ventus A, several other sailplanes ranging from a Schweizer 1-26 to a Nimbus 3 were included. Flight testing included flying into moderate rain showers, and flying with many natural bugs along the wing leading edges. We judged our best overall stall-warning configuration to be a small floating vane mounted well aft on the top surface of the wing, and entered that configuration into the 1998 OSTIV Competition fly-offs at Weiner Neustadt. The Polish entry was judged to be the winner there, but our configuration placed 2nd. The weakness in our design was that its external mounting was subject to damage during club use. The Polish design used the differential pressure measured between the fuselage nose pitot tube and a small flush orifice located on the bottom of the nose several inches aft of the pitot. It is essentially an angle-of-attack indicator, and I believe that it is still marketed today. Although its external mounting makes it subject to handling damage, the DGA design performs well in my opinion, even in rain and with bugs and various flap settings. I have used it on my sailplanes continuously since its development, and feel my flying is safer for that. Its design is shown in the 7/90 issue of Soaring, and I believe it was also published Sailplane & Gliding about that time. Dick Johnson |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We judged our best overall stall-warning configuration to be a small
floating vane mounted well aft on the top surface of the wing, Beechcraft used this system on the early models of the Bonanza. Robert Mudd |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wow, there have been some absolutely excellent posts on this thread. Thank you to all those who contributed... -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I forgot to mention that the stall warning unit, set normally to about
10% stall margin. appears to be of help while thermalling also. Going too slow and/or pulling too many "G" will increase drag, besides being dangerous. A prompt easing of the stick back-pressure quickly silences the small piezo horn's warning signal. Dick Johnson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Rotorcraft | 0 | April 29th 04 08:29 PM |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 29th 04 08:09 PM |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | General Aviation | 0 | April 29th 04 08:09 PM |
Spin on thermal entry - how-to | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 0 | January 29th 04 05:43 PM |
Thermal to Wave contact! | C.Fleming | Soaring | 1 | January 21st 04 01:54 PM |