![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edward Downham wrote:
It is important to note that this margin is there to cope with things such as ASI position and calibration errors. When you fly a glider at an _indicated_ speed of Vne, you might actually be nearer Vd and the realm of the test pilot. No. VNE is an indicated airspeed limit (IAS). If there is a airspeed calibration error, VNE has been reduced to correct it. The margin is there for instrumental errors, and *pilot* errors. As Bill Dean has mentioned, some gliders lose a lot of their control authority over Vd. You may find yourself flying faster and faster and unable to do much about it. Also, the faster you get, the more likely you are to overstress the airframe with control inputs (and I don't just mean the elevator). Have you any reference for this affirmation ? THis is a know issue on earlier delta wings, also in earlier near-transsonic aircraft, but I don't know any glider with such a problem. In most modern gliders you should be able to pull 6g+ without breaking any bits off them. Not at VNE !!! The rise is drag is high, and will pretty certainly arrest any further speed build-up and bring the nose up quite smartly. Also you won't get so close to the ground, if this is a factor. The drag rise is not enough to avoid overspeeds. The rise in drag provided by *airbrakes* (not pulling too hard) is the *only* way to avoid either flutter (above VNE) or breaking the wings (by overloading). Except when too close to the ground this is always the only thing to do. And to come back to the original question, I think there is nothing to fear pulling the airbrakes before getting out of the spin, since it will help stopping the rotation (the outer airbrake will have a greater drag due to greater airspeed) -- Denis R. Parce que ça rompt le cours normal de la conversation !!! Q. Pourquoi ne faut-il pas répondre au-dessus de la question ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:30:57 +0200, Denis
wrote: Edward Downham wrote: It is important to note that this margin is there to cope with things such as ASI position and calibration errors. When you fly a glider at an _indicated_ speed of Vne, you might actually be nearer Vd and the realm of the test pilot. No. VNE is an indicated airspeed limit (IAS). If there is a airspeed calibration error, VNE has been reduced to correct it. The margin is there for instrumental errors, and *pilot* errors. Well, this one is just a little scary. For more than one glider of my acquaintance Vne is given as a TAS in the manual. This can be converted to IAS of course, but the IAS would, of course, decrease with altitude. Vstall, on the other hand, seems just about always to be given as an IAS, and as an IAS the stall speed will remain about the same as altitude increases. This is all pretty basic stuff I know, so I probably misinterpreted your statement about Vne. One way to look at the "coffin corner" situation where some very high-flying aircraft, such as the U-2, I suppose, can end up at an altitude where the stall speed, in TAS, has come very close to the Vne, as a TAS. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote in message
One way to look at the "coffin corner" situation where some very high-flying aircraft, such as the U-2, I suppose, can end up at an altitude where the stall speed, in TAS, has come very close to the Vne, as a TAS. More precisely, I think it's when the stall speed (IAS in the cockpit) but really a TAS issue) approaches the limiting Mach number. Since Mach vs TAS decreases with altitude, and TAS vs IAS increases with altitude, the problem is inevitable for the right (or wrong, depending on your point of view!) kind of plane. Kirk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
No. VNE is an indicated airspeed limit (IAS). If there is a airspeed calibration error, VNE has been reduced to correct it. The margin is there for instrumental errors, and *pilot* errors. Well, this one is just a little scary. For more than one glider of my acquaintance Vne is given as a TAS in the manual. This can be converted to IAS of course, but the IAS would, of course, decrease with altitude. I did not want to raise the question of VNE at altitude (a more difficult subject ;-) and the relation between IAS and TAS. I replied to someone who mentioned the errors of static ports : The calibrated airspeed (CAS) may be higher than the indicated airspeed (IAS) depending og static ports location ; in that case, it is measured during the tests and all limits are corrected to be given in *indicated* airspeed. -- Denis R. Parce que ça rompt le cours normal de la conversation !!! Q. Pourquoi ne faut-il pas répondre au-dessus de la question ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Avoiding Shock Cooling in Quick Descent | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 32 | January 21st 04 04:32 AM |
Avoiding gliders | Stefan | Piloting | 16 | August 6th 03 05:44 AM |