![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bullwinkle wrote:
The absolute most amazing thing: He walked the -20 back to the launch point, Inspected it for damage (found none), hooked up the elevator, and promptly took off. I'd have been shaking for a week after a near miss like that, not have taken off within 15 minutes. I can't believe it! No one asked him to sit down a bit and think about what he made? The towpilot also could be killed so I think this action should be investigated a bit more than this... /Janos |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 10:06:28 +0200, Janos Bauer
wrote: I can't believe it! No one asked him to sit down a bit and think about what he made? The towpilot also could be killed so I think this action should be investigated a bit more than this... I guess he got the message... Bye Andreas |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is more surprising is that the towpilot
let him hook up again. I sure wouldn't tow him again until I had at least a long talk and a day later. I wonder if the tuggie even knew there had been a problem? Janos Bauer wrote: Bullwinkle wrote: The absolute most amazing thing: He walked the -20 back to the launch point, Inspected it for damage (found none), hooked up the elevator, and promptly took off. I'd have been shaking for a week after a near miss like that, not have taken off within 15 minutes. I can't believe it! No one asked him to sit down a bit and think about what he made? The towpilot also could be killed so I think this action should be investigated a bit more than this... /Janos -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, the towpilot knew. He was doing a bit of shaking himself, having just
nearly had his nose driven into the ground. Yet, he, too, drove on that day. As I remember it (this was over 20 years ago) the towpilot made a pattern, landed, towed a couple of other gliders, and then the -20 driver was ready to go again. Janos and Mark raise an interesting point, though: this was a highly thought of pilot, the only one who regularly entered competitions. He went cross country just about every time he towed, when the rest of us were beating the towplane back to the ground. Thus, he was widely perceived as the best pilot on the site. Who would have been in a position to sit him down and have the "come to Jesus" talk he so richly deserved? Thinking back on it, the "culture" at that gliderport just wouldn't have supported it. I wonder how many other places have hot pilots, who are untouchable because of their exalted status as hot sticks? I'm sure they're immune from making basic errors due to their overall excellence, but who among us would dare to counsel Moffatt, Striedieck, Payne, or Knauff if we saw them doing stupid things at our field? Or harder still, at their home fields? (Again, I'm sure none of the legends mentioned would ever deserve counseling, just using their exalted names as examples: no offense intended or implied.) Food for thought. On 4/5/04 2:19 PM, in article 4071b12e$1@darkstar, "Mark James Boyd" wrote: What is more surprising is that the towpilot let him hook up again. I sure wouldn't tow him again until I had at least a long talk and a day later. I wonder if the tuggie even knew there had been a problem? Janos Bauer wrote: Bullwinkle wrote: The absolute most amazing thing: He walked the -20 back to the launch point, Inspected it for damage (found none), hooked up the elevator, and promptly took off. I'd have been shaking for a week after a near miss like that, not have taken off within 15 minutes. I can't believe it! No one asked him to sit down a bit and think about what he made? The towpilot also could be killed so I think this action should be investigated a bit more than this... /Janos -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bullwinkle wrote:
Yes, the towpilot knew. He was doing a bit of shaking himself, having just nearly had his nose driven into the ground. Yet, he, too, drove on that day. As I remember it (this was over 20 years ago) the towpilot made a pattern, landed, towed a couple of other gliders, and then the -20 driver was ready to go again. Janos and Mark raise an interesting point, though: this was a highly thought of pilot, the only one who regularly entered competitions. He went cross country just about every time he towed, when the rest of us were beating the towplane back to the ground. Thus, he was widely perceived as the best pilot on the site. Who would have been in a position to sit him down and have the "come to Jesus" talk he so richly deserved? What talk did he deserve? If he repeated the bad procedures the next week, yes, but what made you think he hadn't learned a valuable lesson? Perhaps he'd already determined the cause and the solution by the time he'd pushed the glider back to the launch point. What makes you think he would repeat that mistake? Not everyone is rattled by a mistake, even a potentially lethal one. Some can analyze it, correct it, and move on. I've seen good pilots do this in minutes, not days. Thinking back on it, the "culture" at that gliderport just wouldn't have supported it. A way to start might have been "Wow, that was close! How are you going to avoid that in the future?" Perhaps the club missed an opportunity to see how mistakes should be handled, and possibly a good pilot didn't get some questioning he needed. -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well!
He's lucky to get away with that! Yes, a talk is required. Not a bollocking, but a sensible talk as to the the cause and solution of the problem. Let's not forget the tug pilot and others on the ground could have been killed. Therefore the matter can not just be left to the "competition" pilot. I wonder what solution he came up with in the few minutes between launches. The only acceptable one would have been to fit safety pin's to all L'Hotellier fitting's. Positive checks would not always have found the problem which causesd this accident. "The safety pin or wire prevents the locking plate from backing out and thus allowing the socket to inadvertently disengage from its corresponding ball". Do some of you still fly without safety pins? If you do don't you are risking your own and other's lives. Lets hope we all have a safe season. Happy flying! Regards Andy Eric Greenwell wrote in message ... Bullwinkle wrote: Yes, the towpilot knew. He was doing a bit of shaking himself, having just nearly had his nose driven into the ground. Yet, he, too, drove on that day. As I remember it (this was over 20 years ago) the towpilot made a pattern, landed, towed a couple of other gliders, and then the -20 driver was ready to go again. Janos and Mark raise an interesting point, though: this was a highly thought of pilot, the only one who regularly entered competitions. He went cross country just about every time he towed, when the rest of us were beating the towplane back to the ground. Thus, he was widely perceived as the best pilot on the site. Who would have been in a position to sit him down and have the "come to Jesus" talk he so richly deserved? What talk did he deserve? If he repeated the bad procedures the next week, yes, but what made you think he hadn't learned a valuable lesson? Perhaps he'd already determined the cause and the solution by the time he'd pushed the glider back to the launch point. What makes you think he would repeat that mistake? Not everyone is rattled by a mistake, even a potentially lethal one. Some can analyze it, correct it, and move on. I've seen good pilots do this in minutes, not days. Thinking back on it, the "culture" at that gliderport just wouldn't have supported it. A way to start might have been "Wow, that was close! How are you going to avoid that in the future?" Perhaps the club missed an opportunity to see how mistakes should be handled, and possibly a good pilot didn't get some questioning he needed. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think there shouldn't be idols at the airports. Simple we can't afford it. We are just simple people with all those mistakes ![]() Not long ago I moved to another club partly because there were such untouchable persons in the previous club. They haven't even flow xc for years but they was known as hot pilots just because they made serious xc flights several years ago. This attitude also scare away several newcomers... Regards, /Janos Bullwinkle wrote: Yes, the towpilot knew. He was doing a bit of shaking himself, having just nearly had his nose driven into the ground. Yet, he, too, drove on that day. As I remember it (this was over 20 years ago) the towpilot made a pattern, landed, towed a couple of other gliders, and then the -20 driver was ready to go again. Janos and Mark raise an interesting point, though: this was a highly thought of pilot, the only one who regularly entered competitions. He went cross country just about every time he towed, when the rest of us were beating the towplane back to the ground. Thus, he was widely perceived as the best pilot on the site. Who would have been in a position to sit him down and have the "come to Jesus" talk he so richly deserved? Thinking back on it, the "culture" at that gliderport just wouldn't have supported it. I wonder how many other places have hot pilots, who are untouchable because of their exalted status as hot sticks? I'm sure they're immune from making basic errors due to their overall excellence, but who among us would dare to counsel Moffatt, Striedieck, Payne, or Knauff if we saw them doing stupid things at our field? Or harder still, at their home fields? (Again, I'm sure none of the legends mentioned would ever deserve counseling, just using their exalted names as examples: no offense intended or implied.) Food for thought. On 4/5/04 2:19 PM, in article 4071b12e$1@darkstar, "Mark James Boyd" wrote: What is more surprising is that the towpilot let him hook up again. I sure wouldn't tow him again until I had at least a long talk and a day later. I wonder if the tuggie even knew there had been a problem? Janos Bauer wrote: Bullwinkle wrote: The absolute most amazing thing: He walked the -20 back to the launch point, Inspected it for damage (found none), hooked up the elevator, and promptly took off. I'd have been shaking for a week after a near miss like that, not have taken off within 15 minutes. I can't believe it! No one asked him to sit down a bit and think about what he made? The towpilot also could be killed so I think this action should be investigated a bit more than this... /Janos -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ELT Checks | Kevin Chandler | Owning | 28 | September 16th 10 02:47 PM |
Formation flying | Bingo | Home Built | 21 | August 23rd 04 12:51 AM |
~ 8 MORE DEAD US SOLDIERS - 93 IN APRIL SO FAR - BUSH CHECKS TURKEY | MORRIS434 | Military Aviation | 0 | April 22nd 04 09:44 AM |
A couple Questions-Ramp Checks and Experimental Operations | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 48 | October 8th 03 09:11 PM |
Flight Checks | Mark Jackson | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 24th 03 06:39 PM |