![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think what many have overlooked is that even today with the K-13 still
increasing in value (no club that I know wants to give one up!) it is still a great trainer fully capable of taking a student from first flight to early X/C (no one says you have to see how quick you get it over with!), an enjoyable Sunday afternoon flyer, and safe.....it's also not yet so expensive we have to restrict who can fly it or raise the dues or rental fees to own it....sure a Grob is nice enough and feels more like an old Buick than a sports car, the K-13 is almost like the family wagon that did take us all on vacations and still will....the K13 will fly slower and stay up when the rest of the fleet is on the ground.. Most pilots will eventually own their own single seaters anyway (at least in the USA) and progress beyond the 2 seat trainer, so if they spend less on more K13's the logic is they will have better access to club members and more members....makes sense to me at least.... regardless....go fly! tim I fly at a club that has a fleet of one K13 and one Grob 103 TwinAstir (much maligned earlier version) Some comments - In weak conditions the Grob sits in the hangar, she is just too heavy to man handle on the airfield bashing circuits for it to be fun. The K13 thermals better in lighter broken lift so everyone wants to be in the K13 on marginal days. The level of discomfort in the rear seat is similar in the TwinAstir because of the strange shape of the back rest. From the front seat I personally prefer the Grob, because I am a great lump with long legs and the bigger cockpit is more comfortable. The K13 requires and gets more maintenance, with recovering and the like, but after decades of service this is a solid investment for the club. Once you take the capital costs into consideration, and the fact that some club members actually want to do the maintenance work (for free, because they enjoy it) the K13 is actually slightly cheaper to keep than the Grob. Both of the gliders have trailers, but we would never consider being out of gliding range of the field with the K13... It might take the whole club to recover her from a field. On a strong day when the mountains beacon, there is a queue for the Grob. For what it is worth the Grob performs similarly to my Standard Cirrus on cross country. Not bad for a "plastic pig". If there had to be only one - I suspect it would be the K13, having both is great. Having a Twin II, so we could still do the aerobatics in the twin would be best. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
Opinions wanted | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 65 | January 21st 04 04:15 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Piloting | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |