![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ramy Yanetz" wrote in message om... Robert Ehrlich wrote in message ... Hopefully one day these devices will replace transponders on ALL aircrafts and will be required on all aircrafts. Then the madness of mid airs will end. Ramy No it wont! More than half of the midairs recently involved aircraft where the pilots were flying together, knew that the other aircraft was there and *still* collided. All that anti collision systems would have added to these situations would have been a bit of total aircraft mass. The problem we currently have is that in spite of knowing that other aircraft are very close by pilots are getting it wrong and banging in to each other. We need to review - Thermal joining techniques Thermal leaving techniques co-thermaling practices co-operative flying practice. Read Paul Adriance's account of his accident earlier this month, it wasn't caused by GPS or any other form of instrumentation, weather or anything else and no form of instrumentation would have changed the outcome. The pilots simply lost situational awareness and in a few moments it all went very wrong. Ian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
See my other reply below. These devices should be capable to warn you of
imminent collision even while thermaling, not just warn you of nearby aircraft. And if they currently don't, they will in the near future. It should not be too difficult to compute collision courses. Ramy "tango4" wrote in message ... "Ramy Yanetz" wrote in message om... Robert Ehrlich wrote in message ... Hopefully one day these devices will replace transponders on ALL aircrafts and will be required on all aircrafts. Then the madness of mid airs will end. Ramy No it wont! More than half of the midairs recently involved aircraft where the pilots were flying together, knew that the other aircraft was there and *still* collided. All that anti collision systems would have added to these situations would have been a bit of total aircraft mass. The problem we currently have is that in spite of knowing that other aircraft are very close by pilots are getting it wrong and banging in to each other. We need to review - Thermal joining techniques Thermal leaving techniques co-thermaling practices co-operative flying practice. Read Paul Adriance's account of his accident earlier this month, it wasn't caused by GPS or any other form of instrumentation, weather or anything else and no form of instrumentation would have changed the outcome. The pilots simply lost situational awareness and in a few moments it all went very wrong. Ian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ramy Yanetz" wrote in message .com...
See my other reply below. These devices should be capable to warn you of imminent collision even while thermaling, not just warn you of nearby aircraft. And if they currently don't, they will in the near future. It should not be too difficult to compute collision courses. That is exactly what FLARM does. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
Anti collision lights mods for Arrow 1968?? | Frode Berg | Piloting | 3 | May 20th 04 05:42 AM |
Anti collision light mod for Piper Arrow 1968 model? | Frode Berg | Owning | 4 | May 20th 04 05:16 AM |
New anti collision system for aircrafts, helicopters and gliders | Thierry | Owning | 10 | February 14th 04 08:36 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |