![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bullwinkle" wrote in message ... On 5/23/04 4:52 PM, in article , "Wayne Paul" wrote: Ah yes, you do have to be at 62K for water to boil; however, the nitrogen in your blood turns to gas at much lower altitude. (For most people it is below 50K.) This phenomenon is what is commonly referred to as "your blood boiling." Experiencing the "bends" is not pleasant! Wayne http://www.soaridaho.com/ Sorry, I normally lurk, but I can't let this one go. A newsgroup is a good place to trade expertise. This happens to be an area in which I have expertise, so please let me share it. Ebullism is the phenomenon which occurs at or above Armstrong's Line, classically 63,000 feet, in which the total barometric pressure falls below the partial pressure of water in the body, thus the equilibrium shifts, and the body begins to give up water to the environment. "Blood boiling" is the somewhat sensationalized term for this. People visualize exploding bodies, and it doesn't actually happen that way. It is a very bad thing, and would likely be fatal, although a short exposure (a few seconds) is likely survivable. Decompression sickness, or DCS, ("the bends") does occur in aviation, as well as (obviously) the diving world. Classic physiology theory recognizes a threshold of 18,000 feet below which it should not be able to occur. It happens when the blood and tissues of the body become supersaturated with nitrogen. At ground level our tissues equilibrate with the atmosphere, and as we ascend, we give up nitrogen to the atmosphere until our tissue partial pressures equal the partial pressure of nitrogen in the atmosphere. Thus, climbers, ascending slowly, never experience DCS, because they stay more or less equilibrated to their current altitude. Aviators, on the other hand, go quickly to altitude. Way too quickly to reduce the amount of nitrogen in their tissues. Thus, they are supersaturated with nitrogen and their respiratory systems are trying like crazy to get rid of the excess. Sometimes it forms bubbles in the bloodstream, which are cleared out by the lungs. Sometimes bubbles form in joints causing the joint pain which originally gave DCS its nickname, the bends. Sometimes bubbles form in the brain or nervous system, causing Type 2, neurological DCS. This can present as stroke-like symptoms. I've treated many, many people with DCS, most from altitude chamber training in the military. I've also done research in which I gave volunteers (really) DCS, in order to track the onset and severity of VGE (the bubbles), and the onset and severity of DCS symptoms at various altitudes. (Then, of course, I brought them back to ground level and treated their DCS appropriately.) I've also had altitude DCS (just the joint pain type, fortunately). You're right: it's not fun, and is a seriously under-recognized hazard in soaring. Wave pilots should know about this, and I'm not sure they appreciate the risk enough. But please don't confuse ebullism with DCS. Completely different processes, with different physiology involved. Thanks for reading A concerned aerospace medicine specialist/aerospace physiologist Very good posting Dr. Bullwinkle... Thanks for sharing this knowledge with us. If I can just persuade you to expand a little more on a couple of points : 1) It still isn't very clear how much of the DCS problem is related to "how fast" we climb :. I remember reading about the phenomenon and concluding (maybe not correctly) that a slow climb isn't really likely to give us a problem. So much so that I don't remember hearing much about Glider Pilots getting "The bends" from wave soaring. It would be a problem for the military pilots who may climb at many thousands of feet per second. 2) out here in the American West, there are many general aviation pilots who routinely perform long flights at +16000ft on oxygen (non-pressurized singles and twins). I've heard their families and even some pilots complain about certain types of pain that they thought was "the bends", but in many cases it turns out to be just the gas we have accumulated in our intestines, that expands to close to twice their volume at those altitudes. Best way to avoid that kind of pain is, of course, a controlled diet avoiding gas-generating food during those trips. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/23/04 9:52 PM, in article
, "Arnie" wrote: [SNIPPAGE] If I can just persuade you to expand a little more on a couple of points : 1) It still isn't very clear how much of the DCS problem is related to "how fast" we climb :. I remember reading about the phenomenon and concluding (maybe not correctly) that a slow climb isn't really likely to give us a problem. So much so that I don't remember hearing much about Glider Pilots getting "The bends" from wave soaring. It would be a problem for the military pilots who may climb at many thousands of feet per second. 2) out here in the American West, there are many general aviation pilots who routinely perform long flights at +16000ft on oxygen (non-pressurized singles and twins). I've heard their families and even some pilots complain about certain types of pain that they thought was "the bends", but in many cases it turns out to be just the gas we have accumulated in our intestines, that expands to close to twice their volume at those altitudes. Best way to avoid that kind of pain is, of course, a controlled diet avoiding gas-generating food during those trips. Arnie, 1) Rates of ascent above, say, 100 fpm is way too fast to equilibrate. Thus you are building a supersaturation (increased body burden of nitrogen). By comparison, climbing is much slower, and you're exercising the whole time (thus moving blood around and clearing tissue compartments more efficiently than sedentary pilots). The recent record setting climb of Everest from base camp to summit in 8 hours, works out to about 24 fpm. Rate of ascent is not particularly predictive or protective, above a certain threshold. Exercising and prebreathing are better than adjusting rates of ascent. 2) Trapped gas problems, like bowel gas, or gas in the middle ears, or gas under a new dental filling, are not DCS. They are certainly aeromedical issues of which pilots and others should be aware, but not DCS. In military altitude chambers, trainees are told not to try to hold their gas out of politeness, rather to let 'er rip. nafod40 (Mike) also asked: Does breathing 100% O2 from chocks to chocks help lower the N2 in the body? In other words, is there a secondary benefit to breathing 100% O2 other than that you don't pass out? Answer: In the studies I did, my test subjects pre-breathed 100% oxygen at ground level for a full hour before going to altitude. They kept breathing 100% oxygen the whole time they were there (at 25, 30 or 40 thousand feet) and they STILL got DCS. Even my inside observers, who prebreathed for two full hours before ascent, occasionally got DCS. They got it at a lower rate, though. My most severe cases of DCS came from this group, though (a case of chokes: resolved quickly in a hyperbaric chamber). Short answer: prebreathing is good, but not perfect. Thanks again. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Answer: In the studies I did, my test subjects pre-breathed 100% oxygen at
ground level for a full hour before going to altitude. They kept breathing 100% oxygen the whole time they were there (at 25, 30 or 40 thousand feet) and they STILL got DCS. Interesting...what were your "victims" ![]() As an aside...there is a cave diving group....the WKPP (also known a GUE and DIR) ...they do extreme duration/depth/penetration cave dives...and get "away with it" on a continual basis (ie its not a one time stunt where they got lucky).....we are talking a constant depth of 300 feet for 6 to 8 hours or more.....and yet they still manage to start such dives in the morning and be back on the surface totally decompressed by the end of daylight....and doppler studies even show few/low bubbles...that group has worked out some interesting deco theory that seems to really work well....so much so the Navy has even been working with them to learn a few things...if your interesting in it I can direct you to the right discussion groups.... take care Blll |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
gps to measure feet? | brucrx | Piloting | 19 | November 13th 04 03:33 AM |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |