![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:09:58 -0400, Todd Pattist
wrote: Tim Newport-Peace ] wrote: What needs to be changed is the wording in the Sporting Code to allow COTS to be use up to a specific level (e.g. Gold C) and an approved Flight Recorder thereafter. Agreed. I'd let the O.O have the responsibility for verifying compliance of the GPS with a bare minimum list of required GPS features , and provide a list of COTS GPS units known to meet those standards: as in "Capable of recording time and position fixes according to WGS 84," etc. It would be simpler for all concerned if the pilot is required to demonstrate compliance with the (published) list of required features to the OO. Benefits: - the pilot has a checklist to use when buying the GPS - the OO doesn't have to understand the GPS and its documentation in the detail needed to verify compliance A demerit that nobody has yet mentioned is that of the poor suffering OO having to understand a multitude of GPS and download programs. -- martin@ : Martin Gregorie gregorie : Harlow, UK demon : co : Zappa fan & glider pilot uk : |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |