![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, that's it. So we must have a rule that no more then three visits to
(declared) turnpoints are allowed. That's the true intention of the flight definition 1.4.5.b. A flight using up to three turnpoints. It doesn't matter at all that one turnpoint is visited twice (the trap) Karel, NL "CV" schreef in bericht ... Todd Pattist wrote: "K.P. Termaat" wrote: Let's consider two declared turnpoints A and B. Without a rule a pilot can claim a flight like Start - A - B - A - B - A - B - ...... Finish. He visited two declared waypoints many times and came finally up with 1000 km. I understand what you're saying, but I think he's made a flight with 6 TurnPoints. We should allow only 3 TP's to be declared, and if you want to visit one twice, then you declare it twice. I agree. He rounded six turn points: TP1, TP2, TP3, ..., TP6. Some of them just happened to be on the same spot on the map. If he only declared two, then only the first two should count. CV |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instructors: is no combat better? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 103 | March 13th 04 09:07 PM |
L.A. Times -- Request and Amendment | Blueskies | Home Built | 0 | August 11th 03 02:35 AM |
L.A. Times -- Request and Amendment | Blueskies | Piloting | 0 | August 11th 03 02:35 AM |