![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Caracole wrote:
Can I get some opinions from some of the 302 users on the pros and cons of using TE compensation verses electronic compensation? Such as, which do you prefer and what your experience has been using each. In short, what do you like and what are you not totally happy with about this instrument. I've used it both ways for several hundred hours each, and didn't notice any difference in operation while gliding. This is on an ASH 26 E: Prandtl tube on fin for pneumatic compensation; nose pitot/tail statics for electronic compensation. I prefer the electronic compensation because the vario works better when the motor is running. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cambridge Instruments | Ian McPhee | Soaring | 2 | June 18th 04 10:14 AM |
Cambridge Aero Explorer Fix | Guy Byars | Soaring | 8 | May 19th 04 03:04 AM |
Combat Related Special Compensation update for Sept. 8-12 | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 17th 03 03:38 AM |
Updated IGC approval documents for Cambridge GNSS flight recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 03 05:28 PM |
Cambridge Aero Instruments | Ulrich | Soaring | 6 | August 7th 03 05:48 PM |