![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rgds, I did say "uniformly ascending mass of air", I didn't say how one got there. For the given condition it's just a statement of Newton's first law. If you've done any relativity, you'll know that the twins paradox in special relativity suffers from the same problem. Derrick Steed Hi, But you CAN fool an accelerometer in a uniformly ascending mass of air, but not a vario... How? You have to enter that mass of air at some point and there you will record the acceleration. Ciao, MM -- Marian Aldenhövel, Rosenhain 23, 53123 Bonn. Fon +49 228 624013, Fax +49 228 624031. http://www.marian-aldenhoevel.de http://www.marian-aldenhoevel.de "Wie trennt man drei Schlampen von zwei Säufern? Cockpittüre zu!" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I did say "uniformly ascending mass of air", I didn't say how one got there. All right. If you put an accelerometer in an ascending mass of air and then, when it moves with that mass of air, read it, it will show zero. I concede that :-). But that is the same thing as saying a vario will read zero when the pressure around it is not changing. I cannot quite understand how that relates to "fooling" an accelerometer. There is no way to get it from lying on the ground to moving with the uniformly ascending mass of air without it showing a non-zero value at some point in time. So, if birds can be made to believe that they are changing altitude by putting them in a pressure chamber and changing ambient pressure, then I think accelerometers as sensors are indeed ruled out. At least as singular source of input. In these experiments how does one know that the bird thinks it is climbing or descending? If you put a human into the same chamber it will likely notice a change in pressure, even if not as small a change as the bird. But we are rarely able to tell which way, much less relate the relative change in pressure to absolute change in altitude. Designing an experiment where one can make sure the bird translates pressure change to altitude seems hard to me. Ciao, MM -- Marian Aldenhövel, Rosenhain 23, 53123 Bonn. Fon +49 228 624013, Fax +49 228 624031. http://www.marian-aldenhoevel.de "Wie trennt man drei Schlampen von zwei Säufern? Cockpittüre zu!" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 71 | June 10th 04 08:02 PM |
Kerry begins circling the drain: | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 0 | February 12th 04 06:04 PM |
What determines LNAV "circling mode"? | Jack | Soaring | 11 | November 20th 03 05:15 AM |
Circling To Land On NDB-B and NDB-C | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | July 13th 03 03:46 PM |