A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Circling for rodents?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 6th 04, 08:36 AM
Derrick Steed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Rgds,
I did say "uniformly ascending mass of air", I didn't say how one got there. For the given condition it's just a statement of Newton's first law.

If you've done any relativity, you'll know that the twins paradox in special relativity suffers from the same problem.

Derrick Steed
Hi,

But you CAN fool an accelerometer in a uniformly ascending mass of air, but
not a vario...


How? You have to enter that mass of air at some point and there you
will record the acceleration.

Ciao, MM
--
Marian Aldenhövel, Rosenhain 23, 53123 Bonn.
Fon +49 228 624013, Fax +49 228 624031.
http://www.marian-aldenhoevel.de http://www.marian-aldenhoevel.de
"Wie trennt man drei Schlampen von zwei Säufern? Cockpittüre zu!"







  #2  
Old July 6th 04, 10:18 AM
Marian Aldenhövel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

I did say "uniformly ascending mass of air", I didn't say how one got there.


All right. If you put an accelerometer in an ascending mass of air and
then, when it moves with that mass of air, read it, it will show zero.
I concede that :-).

But that is the same thing as saying a vario will read zero when the
pressure around it is not changing.

I cannot quite understand how that relates to "fooling" an
accelerometer. There is no way to get it from lying on the ground
to moving with the uniformly ascending mass of air without it showing
a non-zero value at some point in time.

So, if birds can be made to believe that they are changing altitude by
putting them in a pressure chamber and changing ambient pressure, then
I think accelerometers as sensors are indeed ruled out. At least as
singular source of input.

In these experiments how does one know that the bird thinks it is
climbing or descending? If you put a human into the same chamber it
will likely notice a change in pressure, even if not as small a
change as the bird. But we are rarely able to tell which way, much
less relate the relative change in pressure to absolute change in
altitude.

Designing an experiment where one can make sure the bird translates
pressure change to altitude seems hard to me.

Ciao, MM
--
Marian Aldenhövel, Rosenhain 23, 53123 Bonn.
Fon +49 228 624013, Fax +49 228 624031.
http://www.marian-aldenhoevel.de
"Wie trennt man drei Schlampen von zwei Säufern? Cockpittüre zu!"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 71 June 10th 04 08:02 PM
Kerry begins circling the drain: Tarver Engineering Military Aviation 0 February 12th 04 06:04 PM
What determines LNAV "circling mode"? Jack Soaring 11 November 20th 03 05:15 AM
Circling To Land On NDB-B and NDB-C S. Ramirez Instrument Flight Rules 7 July 13th 03 03:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.